Scott Minto and Darren Ambrose if Spurs have got it wrong by allowing Pierre-Emile Højbjerg to join Marseille on loan with an option to buy.
Subscribe: https://youtube.com/c/talkSPORT
Enjoyed this YouTube video? 😍
🖥️ talkSPORT’s Website: https://talksport.com/
📲 talkSPORT’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/talkSPORT
📷 talkSPORT’s Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talksport/?hl=en
👤 talkSPORT’s Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/talkSPORT/
📱 talkSPORT’s Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talksport?
🔴 Download the talkSPORT app HERE! – https://talksport.com/apps/
🔎 Want to see if you feature on our YouTube channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFVMnSsi_04LGLa9pS9xDv__me-Gjmlu2
#talkSPORT
#PremierLeague
#Tottenham

44 Comments
Loan with the obligation to buy and a sell-on clause. 20+ million Euros. Nothing wrong with the deal.
There are still in-comings and plenty of time left in the transfer window. This is a non-issue.
If he’s seen him play
He’d say otherwise.
Is he smoking?
Hojberg a decent player, but if he doesn't really fit the system in the long term then no point postponing the inevitable and wasting everyone's time and hindering their careers while stunting progress of the team.
😂 hes been the weak link in the team, he doesn't fit anges style, you should be glad to see him go if youre a spurs fan
He's not technical enough, poor passing, slow & has a serious error every game
Is it me or do talksport know jack s**t about football outside of England
Dominated Rice in the Euro's, played rings around them
Worse players still here than Hojberg
It’s an obligation mate
Who ends up higher villa or spurs
Surplus to requirements…. nice little £17m for a bench option at best
He still walked all over englands "superstar" midfield in the euros 😂😂😂😂
Bang average player. Spurs have got nowhere near winning anything with Hojbjerg playing regularly.
How do you tell me Havertz was superb. Superb last season? Wow!
The circus needs its clowns back
Confirmed Ambrose is a twat. After they bought Gray they have enough midtfielders.
Hell go win trophies now!
Talking about individual moments but he’s inconsistent over a season and doesn’t fit the style of play
Ambrose hasn't got a clue what he's talking about. What off the line did holjberg make?? When was that??
And it's a obligation to buy not a option. Read before you speak
He’s an average to decent premier league footballer who was a good servant for the club. Ambrose’s analysis is a bit weird. He’s not marmite to spurs fans at all, we all know he’s done well but limited… he can’t play Ange’s football… this is such a perfect deal it makes me wonder what these two know about football to be talking like this.
Obligation to buy.. he wouldn’t sign a new contract because he wants more game time. We have sold him for roughly what we paid for him, so it’s a fair deal. I’ll miss him, he’s a decent player.
No question about his application and efforts for the club, but he just doesn’t fit Ange’s system of football…. I wish him well, great servant of the club
This is someone who hasn't been watching Spurs regularly. Good player; wrong system.
£50 million for Onana is too much but Max Killman for £40million is a great signing 😂😂
this window is intriguring for spurs. Ange needs to be backed. they need GOOD players. if not, they have no chance of top four.
Hojberg is a good player but he can’t play our playing style at all and has wanted to leave for 2 years and has shown that.
Haven’t troubled yourself to learn about the details of the loan. It’s to balance Marseille’s books. Not ours. There is an obligation to buy. They are buying him but loaning for the first year.
I'm a spurs fan I've always liked Hojbjerg but he doesn't want to be there and he suits a slower style of play, doesn't suit Spurs and Anges style. £17mill for 28 year old in last year of contract is great
What a moron of a pundit. It's a loan with obligation to buy. A player who was awful every start last season & who doesn't fit the way Ange plays. Also if bonuses are reached we get more for him than we bought him for.
He can have all the passion but he isn’t good enough and it’s clear
Doesn't suit the system at all.. decent player sure but doesn't suit the system. Better for him and the club to move on
No mention of Bergvail lol hojberg 1 year left and he doesn’t suit the way we want to play….i heard it’s an obligation to buy so it’s a done deal…it’s not a massive loss and we need to players that Ange wants what’s the point of him sitting on the bench unhappy. IN ANGE WE TRUST🙌🏾
I think Hojbjerg is a very good player, the sort of player who could easily be part of a Champion's League squad. Surprising they'd let him go, honestly.
Reports have been saying that he wants to leave since before Ange joined the club, and he doesn't suit Ange's style of play. He was never going to get past Bissouma or Sarr into the first team regularly, and Gray is clearly going to get game time this season. Hojbjerg is just taking up room in the squad, and we always run close to the non-homegrown player limits, so selling him makes sense. Same with Lo Celso now that Bergvall is in.
Ignorant commentators
Ambrose is alright, don't do silly story or comments
What do you mean allow him to leave the club … we could not push him out fast enough.
I don't know what we are playing at, we have a worse squad than Villa and seem to be pinning our hopes on a couple of kids (Bergvall and Archie Gray) I don't have any hope for the coming season depressing being a Spurs fan and knowing that nothing changes until Levy/ENIC leave and that ain't happening.
Thank God he left!!!!
They obviously haven’t seen our new signings yet
he's not good on the ball… he doesnt fit Ange's system.
Was more consistent than Bissouma. Not sure why we would could the squad down
I'm disappointed it's only a loan deal !!
We need better midfielders and he makes alot of mistakes and doesnt have pace. Have tou been paying attention to what ange needs and wants? Obviously not…