Andrew Wiebe is back for another edition of Instant Replay as he analyzes the most controversial plays from Matchday 36 & 37.
📺 Watch every match with MLS Season Pass on Apple TV: http://apple.co/MLS
The 🐐 plays here: https://www.mlssoccer.com/messi/
➡️ Subscribe Now: https://www.youtube.com/c/mls
➡️ Follow us on:
– TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mls?lang=en
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mls
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLS
– Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MLS
➡️ Para Español:
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mlses
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLSes
– Facebook: facebook.com/espanol.mls
For more information about MLS, go to the league’s official website: http://www.MLSsoccer.com, en español http://www.MLSes.com
#mls #highlights #mlsseasonpass #soccer #futbol
21 Comments
Gotta be the worst take ive ever seen you give on that cleats into the thigh backbending gymnastics reasoning
lol. This is a joke
I love how some of these red and yellow cards are absolutely ridiculous. There are a couple of times when those yellows and reds wouldn’t even be cards in England. MLS is soft and dull. No wonder Europeans think our soccer is a joke.
The only one where I disagree is the DOGSO in Atlanta vs RBNY game. I understand why it was called on the field, but if I were VAR, I'm sending the ref to the monitor. The attacker is looking for that, and only that. He jumped awkwardly and fell. Yes, there was contact, but that contact did not affect the angle of the attacker's leg or how he was going to land. That's not a foul. I'd book him for simulation. He denied himself of his own goalscoring opportunity.
The miami hate is hilarious, it's fascinating how bias can contort the eyes into seeing something that didn't happen. Busquets kicks the ball, the player kicks up into Busquets studs. Keep those thumbs in your mouths.
I appreciate hearing the perspective about these different plays on their own, but I'd like to propose something for future editions. Would it be helpful to compare why one play gets called one way, but a second play gets called differently? Compare the Busquets – Farsi call, where no card is issued, and the Nealis – Mosquera call, where there's a red card. What is different between them? In neither play does Busquets / Nealis intentionally jump in on their opponent, they are both looking at the ball. But one gets a red card, and one gets nothing. What are the reasons, from a referee's perspective, why the calls play out differently?
So no foul on Busquets for winning the ball but endangering his opponent, but yes good call on Camacho because, even though he wins the ball, he endangers his opponent. Got it, great analysis here!
Also how can Busquets not go in studs up, yet his studs make direct contact with Farsi's thigh? If he weren't going into the challenge studs up the top of his foot would have made contact.
Another Wiebe masterclass in "I'll say whatever so I can keep my $50k salary"
At 3:27 although the VAR video show no view from the opposite side, the Referee was looking at the play from the opposite side and the Ref made the call on the field. Good call by the ref. Thanks for these videos.
You forgot the Inter Miami goal that the female referee flagged as offside … it was an own goal … shame on her
riding on that Messi meat , we know who is getting mls cup for christmas. !!
So let me get this straight. It was a 50/50 ball which means Farsi had as much right to it as Busquets. Busquets comes in hard, high and with studs out and cleats Farsi in the inner thigh/knee and it's Farsi's fault? Even if you win the ball it can still be a foul and a card. But Camacho comes in low, wins the ball, hits the player in the side of the foot with the side of his foot or leg and it's a second yellow because he "might have" got him with the cleats? Sorry but that's horse crap.
Screw Austin and your tin pot club, Biro needs to be banned from the league.
Yeah, you missed the challenge on Bukari. The tackle was coming from behind and contact was made right below the knee…I don't know how many times I have seen this kinda challenge end careers. I feel like not giving a red on this challenge, escalated tension and the ref immediately lost control of the game from then on.
Wiebe, you're a joke. That's minimum a yellow on Busquets. Minimum. He should have been gone
Very easy to see the Miami favoritism here…..
One would have thought that a video to review controversial decisions might actually contain at least one controversial decision .. but, no :/
"he doesn't expose his studs" … as video shows studs embed themselves in player's thigh :/
Atlanta PK: The left leg looks to be coming up without contact there and before any upper body contact indicating the attacker was going down no matter what. That said, this isn't anywhere near clear enough for VAR to get involved. VAR needs to stick to their duty and stop trying to re-referee the calls. They've overstepped more and more this year. I love that the center referees are shutting them down.
MLS Instant Replay: We will talk about when refs make mistakes and try to showcase missed calls. Unless those calls negatively impact Columbus, in which case those are perfectly fine plays, no problem, carry on.
Genuine question here after reading the comments. I'm a columbus crew fan, and I will absolutely admit that I'm biased in the inconsistency of the Busquets and Camacho calls. I just want a good competivie league to enjoy the game i love playing and watching. But my question here is, for those who are on the side of "the refs got it wrong/miami favoritism", are you all CC fans too, or are you less biased on the call (not being from the CC fan base). Genuinely looking for honest opinions here.
Great job completely avoiding the second studs up, two footed tackle by Sergio on Cucho 🤣
They aren't even trying to hide it anymore. Inter MyMoney
Busquets hit the ball and then columbus player kicked him before Busquets gets in his leg… So the yelow card should get Columbus player, first learn about the rules…