Danny Murphy & Danny Kelly discuss England’s 1-0 defeat Vs Brazil and Danny Murphy makes the claim that England are too Reliant on Harry Kane.
Subscribe: https://youtube.com/c/talkSPORT
Enjoyed this YouTube video? 😍
🖥️ talkSPORT’s Website: https://talksport.com/
📲 talkSPORT’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/talkSPORT
📷 talkSPORT’s Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talksport/?hl=en
👤 talkSPORT’s Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/talkSPORT/
📱 talkSPORT’s Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talksport?
🔴 Download the talkSPORT app HERE! – https://talksport.com/apps/
🔎 Want to see if you feature on our YouTube channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFVMnSsi_04LGLa9pS9xDv__me-Gjmlu2
#talksport
#harrykane
#england
#englandfootball
#garethsouthgate
#premierleague
15 Comments
Stating the bloody obvious again Danny boy
Football team is reliant on best players. No way
The English FA need stop being afraid of picking an overwhelmingly black squad for the senior team. The reality is the English squad would look much more like France’s side if the best players were picked purely on talent and ability.
What game was he watching wasnt the one i was watching
Kane is the best striker in the world, his finishing is one of the best the premier league has ever seen I’ve never understood the amount of hate he’s gotten, people think that he’s just another overhyped English player when in reality Kane is what he’s hyped up to be.
France is too reliant on mbappe?! Think Danny might be on to something here.. teams rely on their best players.
He just want England manager to coach Manchester united. He just has too much issues with united currently manager. Someone needs to make him understand what football really is even if he was a former footballer. England manager will make all them players looks bad.
Kane could have played vs Brazil and it wouldn't have made any difference whatsoever. This completely misses the point.
For God's sake, one defeat in a friendly and everyone loses their minds
England should win the Euros even without Kane. Trying to act like Watkins and Tony aren’t good enough. The problem is the ineptness of our coach.
I disagree. For me, I've always felt England having a decent game entirely depends on the 3 attacking players behind Kane, since these are usually and supposed to be players creating. If those selected in those positions have bad or mediocre games, England tend to struggle with making chances and scoring.
Kane is just Kane, you give him chances and he's probably gonna score. He can create, but that's not his job. So for me, the main issue is attacking midfielders, and we are stacked in that department. But really, most of us only want to see Foden, Saka, Bellingham start. Everyone else is not 100% agreed upon.
Delusional Danny. This guy is a joke artist.
Murphy on Southgate’s payroll ???
I agree that England do rely on Harry Kane probably more than any other player because Toney and Watkins as good as they are, are not at his level. But Danny's analysis of the game is a bit weird. England pressed at times sure but Brazil coped with it, England had no clear cut chances. IN fact I am not sure they even had a shot on target, did they?
There was no chemistry or team in regards to midfield & attack. Rarely I saw good plays between Bellingham & Rice, the balance & chemistry doesn't work as well.. either they need more training or a third midfielder who can balance things between them. Foden was invisible, people say he wasn't provided service but he's not a number 9, he's a versatile player with mobility that can move around in space to receive the ball.
When Bellingham was in attack, there were not a lot of option & he'd wait for a good pass which he'd give at times but his team mates will lose it or they wouldn't know what's the next step. It was like no attack pattern or know how. It felt awkward like they're all stuck in a sandpit, no fluidity or team work.