The ESPN FC crew discuss Chelsea’s midfield and how Moises Caicedo would potentially fit.

✔ Subscribe to ESPN+: http://espnplus.com/soccer/youtube
✔ Subscribe to ESPN FC on YouTube: http://bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEtoESPNFC

26 Comments

  1. CHELSEA PLEASE SIGN PLAYER AGE ABOVE 18 YEARS OLD TO AGE BELOW 24 YEARS OLD BECAUSE LIKE THIS ALL PLAYER CAN PLAY FOOTBALL MINIMUM 10 YEARS TO MAXIMUM 16 YEARS

  2. It is funny that the pundits are not going crazy about how long and how many bids. If this was Arsenal, the media would have been buzzing. Chelsea should leave this negotiations.

  3. On every platform I can see fans urging the club to walk away and sign a cheaper alternative. There are plenty of good CDM's out there. Put our scouting network to work and find another Nicholas Jackson like player for the DM slot. We're not desperate, theres plenty of time left in the window. We walked away from Ugarte because of the inflated salary PSG offered, this is even worse!!!

  4. What is Frank saying. The players that left never wanted to remain at Chelsea, so Chelsea should go and start buying 30 years old players or 35 years old players before you say they have experience???? This man self is a big problem to Chelsea…. nothing Frank ever see good about Chelsea. Chelsea won the champions league against City, Frank still complained… you are too dilutional. Why don't you go and take over a championship team let's see where you will end up… rubbish

  5. What is termed 'experience'? If it means someone who has played the role for years they also have to be good enough. Enzo is a WC winner and Young Player of the tournament winner and he's good enough.
    I suspect ESPN clowns are concerned Chelsea will be second to none in MF with Enzo and Caicedo if they're truthful?

  6. Come on man yes experience is needed no doubt maybe on second thought Chelsea FC should have kept maybe kovacic or Ngolo Kante but perhaps they had to sell to recoup a decent amount to be reinvested. Then again I think the young lads will do well and gain the so called experience over time under the guidance of Pochettino. Brighton would sell caceido they are just playing hardball to get the price up even further.

  7. "…You don't need to put 100 million every time if you're Chelsea, to get a player: Mudryk, Fenandez, Caicedo. I mean, Chelsea is becoming the Bank of the football World."

    Frank Lebouff.

  8. Brighton has £ signs in front of their eyes and are being greedy, Caicedo must hand in a transfer request to show he actually wants to join us, £100 is too much and if we paid that it would make club look bad in future transfers

  9. For me that’s it….done finish…80 was my maximum and even then feels way too much….go and get the Fiorentina moroco guy for 30…or a paulhino the Brazilian guy…or my favourite and nr1 would be the inter Barrela. All 3 way cheaper and maybe better…

  10. In what way is Caicedo "so sought after"? It's ONLY Chelsea who are interested at the moment. Maybe if he was £40m/£50m others would be too, but currently only one club are negotiating to buy him, so he is NOT "so sought after".

  11. Moises is pretty good… Had a great year last season… His teammate Mitoma looks like he’s really going to have a breakthrough season I predict Mitoma to really shine in the upcoming season… Obviously this is a business and they only bought Moises for 5 million so they can definitely cash a huge check selling him… but if Brighton keeps the team together they can be competitive in the league with him but money might be more important than winning to them at this point…

  12. We know the media don’t like chelsea , the media looks for expro that was really good players to comment on the club in a bad light …. Last time we won the premier I was here and on sky watching ppl talking bad abt the club

Leave A Reply