Welcome to ESPN FC Extra Time
0:00 Stevie is fuming at Kay
0:55 Did the crew have any FA Cup rituals?
4:40 Would Harry Kane have scored more goals than Haaland if he was at Man City?
5:57 Who would Stevie want to face in a duel?
7:48 The most memorable moment from this ESPN FC TV season?
9:10 Would Bruno Fernandez make the City/United combined 11?
10:24 Who gets an EPL job first: Lampard, Gerrard or Potter?
11:10 Any regrets on your playing career?
12:00 Who wins the EPL first: Arsenal or Chelsea?
✔ Subscribe to ESPN+: http://espnplus.com/soccer/youtube
✔ Subscribe to ESPN FC on YouTube: http://bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEtoESPNFC
23 Comments
Why are people trying to discredit Haaland and overrate Kane, it is not like Haaland has started scoring at City, he has good goal scoring records any where he has played. He has massive goal records at Norway not even Kane can match while playing for England.
Stop all the hyping of Kane.
no
The combined 11? They sutrly didn't put on their thinking caps. Casemiro, Rashford and Lisandro Martinez would make it
Would Haaland have 30 goals in a poor side like spurs?
No he wouldn't.
Kieran in the studio!!!! Loved him and Stevie going back and forth all show. Would love to see the mayor of Newcastle(Shaka), Stevie the Liverpool legend, the grouch from Chelsea(Craig) and the gunner himself Kieran all on set next season. Show been getting better and better everyday.
Dan come back please 😅
No he scored over 20 less. You are only counting the league goals.
Simple answer is yes absolutely. More assist too.
I think Kane is a better player, but Haaland is a better striker. I think Haaland would score slightly more goals in both scenarios because Haaland gets a lot of goals with his pace, that Kane doesn't have. Haaland can stretch teams with his speed, Kane doesn't do that.
Kay really enjoys a good laugh lol
Stop it
Goals are debatable. He would surely get more assists
I am so mad that my card is being declined for some reason. I wanted to deposit £100 and bet on UTD winning the FA cup. I really have a good hunch
Haaland has a much better positioning and intuition for a striker , kane has more playmaking in him but that's not required much in man city
What are you guys saying. Halaad has 54 in all comps Kane has 30 in all comps. There's a huge difference.
Ah, another brilliant show with all of you 🤣
Haaland would score more for Tottenham and Kane would score more for City.
Kane would have taken more penalties so probably more goals
It's like saying i would've been a better goal scorer if i Were a PL footballer
Imagine scoring 30 goals in that Tottenham team then people question if you won't score more in a City team that scores goals for fun…
oh my god am i watching dumb n dumber
Of course Hislop would pick Rashford over Grealish …