TLDR: Manchester City were found to have broken most of the financial rules at issue. Mancini says the alleged second contract from his time as manager is “not my concern”.
Southern_Tower2655 on
It makes alot of sense. Why would an employee be concerned about getting paid extra by the employer?
11 Comments
TLDR: Manchester City were found to have broken most of the financial rules at issue. Mancini says the alleged second contract from his time as manager is “not my concern”.
It makes alot of sense. Why would an employee be concerned about getting paid extra by the employer?
https://preview.redd.it/ljujz3k0t8sh1.png?width=912&format=png&auto=webp&s=47a65651689725a770315c2258ce2eaa711f845c
Yeah, he wasn’t paid illegally, why would he be concerned?
Why would it be?
Top tier journalism this… man not breaking law isn’t worried about a case he isn’t apart of.
Man city isn’t a party to his second contract, why is it an issue for Man City?
Bobby did nothing wrong. He carried out his duties in relation to Al Jazeera as per contract, and was paid accordingly.
i dunno how this is relevant to him?
I wonder if and when Arteta geta strung up?
Surely he is gonna get questioned? Right?
He was working there in the time frame…
What about the kit man?? Its always the kit man.
Was there ever any evidence of him doing any of this consultancy work for this other club?