Share.

16 Comments

  1. ChoosingAGoodName on

    If Napoli qualify for the Champions League we kight just make a bit of money off the guy!

  2. Embarrassed-Map-7187 on

    History will say that Hojlund was a very very good striker. But he moved to the wrong club and certainly at the wrong time. He was nowhere near ready to be leading their line, especially when they were hemorrhaging their supply line.

  3. Lord_Sesshoumaru77 on

    Pretty much confirmed he’s making this move permanent. Wish him the very best.

  4. WoodenAfternoon2 on

    The fact that some people thought or still think. He’s better than Sesko, just because he has more goals, is insane to me.

  5. Like any good forward, he makes the runs, all he needs is supply, and NOT to wrestle people at the halfway line. I know we joke and kid about the series a but Rasmus is the second highest goal getter when he’s had his supply line injured more than half the time. Probably does help that his biggest competitor in lukaku is injured, but imagine if he had just de bruyne

  6. I really like Hojlund, that being said, you won’t get half that space in the championship, the standard is so bad over there.

  7. Correct_Font on

    Dalot would have taken 3 touches and passed back to the centre half just to be safe

  8. AliveAssistance7667 on

    It’s a Højlund stinker game. Don’t let yourself get fool by this goal. He later on missed an easy header. Højlund is only good when he doesn’t score in Serie A. He created many chances and built attack in those game.

    The difference between Højlund and Sesko is Sesko thrives in air and Højlund gets bullied there but Højlund actually has better vision than Sesko. Sesko has better shot range and shot power. Overall Sesko tops Højlund as a player but Højlund’s striker instinct tops Sesko as a striker.

  9. All Garnacho had to fucking do is speed to the line AND CUT THE FUCKING BALL BACK FOR A GOAL TO BE SCORED BY THE FUCKING GOAL-SCORER