π SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/@GOALFanZone?sub_confirmation=1
Is Manchester United midfielder Bruno Fernandes better than Arsenal’s Martin Odegaard, Manchester City’s Kevin De Bruyne, Chelsea’s Enzo Fernandez and more? Man Utd fan Firas thinks so in this 5v1 football fan debate!
π Follow us on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@goalfanzone
π And don’t forget Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/goalfanzone
#football #premierleague #manchesterunited #mufc
22 Comments
Not better than De Bruyne. His ball carrting is so poor and lets be honest De bruyne has a way better weight of pass than Bruno. Ofc Man United fans took one compliment from KDB to Bruno's "creative machine" and ran to the hills with it. Forgetting that de bruyne was rating Bruno with odegaard and someone elseπ.
Him: what does Bruno have over KDB? / Me: stfu and let him cook π
Bruno had more chances (600+) from the time he came to the league than kdb (400+) and Bruno was playing with the likes of antony garnacho and martial as forwards
Creating a chance means that you give a pass that someone shoots after receiving your pass, that's why the number of created chances are not important because you have a measure called created chances quality (expected assists) which even doku and Cherki are higher than Bruno this season
Secondly you have to measure the number of chances per 90 which KDB comes up with 3.3 chances created per 90 (that's since Bruno came to Man UTD)
And Bruno has like 2.01 chances per 90
What is the point of the video?
*2nd best midfielder in the prem since debut
Im not hating bruno or utd,i respect bruno a lot,he is a man utd legend easily
The only reason im saying is that u cannot use chances created as a metric because if u look at the games,he sometimes forces chances,sometimes,i ain't saying thats bad but thats a lil bad argument without context
Give it 2-3 yrs,he might be considered better than kdb(only in the prem thoh,kdb is much better overall,he gets debated with kroos,modric,xavi and iniesta,i ain't sayin he better than them,but he is surely debatable man)
Also im a neutral,i don't support any prem team,i love bruno thoh
I am a United fan… But to be fair KDB was next level…no one could match that
In United fan and itβs KDB
Kdb stand with the greats like gerrad lampard kroos modric, no point of comparing him with bruno
Both are different
My eyes kdb better
But
Trust wise Bruno by miles
If u put kdb into utd he cannot do what Bruno do
And same thing
If u put Bruno to city he cannot do what kdb do
That means potential wise kdb better but in your lowest situation Bruno always shine
Idiots like him are the reason manu fans are so hated,choosing bruno over a top 2 prem player of the last generation is crazy
For Haaland they said he is food because he played with Kdb and for kdb they are saying reverse
ππ
De Bruyne is 10X smarter than Bruno with higher efficiency and bigger moments leading to title wins. Itβs really not even a debate. You can put Bruno second thatβs fine but De Bruyne is closer to Zidane, Iniesta etc than he is to Bruno.
Kdb had rodri, Bruno had mctominay π
KDB was miles clear than fernandes
Bruno only has more chances created and GA because he's played more games buddy
Kdb is miles ahead of Bruno
Kdb is the greatest midfielder of premier league history
and people hate on arsenal fans
So we r ignore the fact that bruno played with ronaldo ?
Kdb decided leagues
de bruyne made sterling and Sane 100million wingers in there time in City…..meanwhile bruno only stat padded himself and no striker was able to get successful after he joined united….
Bruno best chance creator 600 chances created since join man utd
Kdb only had 436
Bruno can score ,assist ,defend
He is the best CAM in this current gen