Close Menu
    "Rashford was OFFSIDE!" 👀 Sawyer and Cascarino are BAFFLED that Fernandes' goal was allowed!
    World Cup 2026

    “Rashford was OFFSIDE!” 👀 Sawyer and Cascarino are BAFFLED that Fernandes' goal was allowed!



    Natalie Sawyer and Tony Cascarino discuss Manchester United’s controversial goal that helped them secure a win over Man City!

    Enjoyed this YouTube video? 😍

    Subscribe here: https://youtube.com/c/talkSPORT

    Check out some of talkSPORT’s MOST POPULAR content 🔥

    ⚽ HEATED DEBATE! Simon Jordan & Graeme Souness CLASH over Erik ten Hag’s treatment of Man United player Cristiano Ronaldo

    ⚽ Simon Jordan has his say on Gary Neville working for Qatar-based BeIN Sports during the 2022 World Cup

    ⚽ Ben Foster says Edwin Van Der Sar would do minimal training and still be ready to play for Manchester United

    ⚽ Simon Jordan GOES IN on Gary Neville for his Man Utd vs Liverpool commentary

    ⚽ Rudiger intermediary Saif Rubie makes bombshell Chelsea claims and clashes with Simon Jordan

    ⚽ Academy Award Winner Gary Oldman is baffled by Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney’s purchase of Wrexham

    ⚽ INCREDIBLE CLASH! Ray Parlour and Robbie Lyle get HEATED over claims AFTV want Arsenal to LOSE!

    ⚽ Ben Foster tells talkSPORT that the Premier League would have ‘sued’ him if he recorded the games he played for Watford

    ⚽ Simon Jordan and Graeme Souness CLASH over Daniel Levy’s role at Tottenham

    ⚽ Simon Jordan GOES IN on Jurgen Klopp for calling out Gabby Agbonlahor

    ⚽ Simon Jordan argues that Manchester City do spend FAR MORE than Liverpool and other Premier League clubs

    ⚽ Simon Jordan reacts to Chelsea owner Todd Boehly’s suggestion of a North vs South Premier League All-Star game

    ⚽ Is Manchester City’s Erling Haaland better than Tottenham’s Harry Kane? talkSPORT’s Graeme Souness thinks he could be!

    ⚽ Simon Jordan doesn’t think Steven Gerrard has the ability to be a manager in the Premier League

    🖥️ talkSPORT’s Website: /https://talksport.com/
    📲 talkSPORT’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/talkSPORT
    📷 talkSPORT’s Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talksport/?hl=en
    👤 talkSPORT’s Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/talkSPORT/
    📱 talkSPORT’s Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talksport?

    🔴 Download the talkSPORT app HERE! – https://talksport.com/apps/

    🔎 Want to see if you feature on our YouTube channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFVMnSsi_04LGLa9pS9xDv__me-Gjmlu2

    #talkSPORT
    #PremierLeague
    #ChampionsLeague
    #FACUP
    #SimonJordan
    #EuropaLeague
    #LauraWoods
    #AllyMcCoist
    #ManUtd
    #ManCity
    #Liverpoolfc
    #Arsenalfc
    #Chelseafc

    Share.
    View 31 Comments

    31 Comments

    5. MAN AIR on

      VAR had nothing to do with the call. Play to the whistle. If one of the city players put a tackle in there would have been no argument. I’m a UTD fan so I’m not arsed, just her ready for another rule change.

    8. isslavik on

      I like how people are suddenly confused that offside is subjective when it literally happened a week ago between Wolves and Liverpool, when Salah was offside behind the defender when the ball was played to him. Argument would have been had Salah not been there, defender could have just let the ball run to the keeper then.

    12. Larrymore Boham on

      Interference by the rules is defined by touching the ball, blocking the opposing goalkeeper's line of view and preventing the opposing player from getting the ball. Rashford didn't do any of these so the decision to stand as a goal is right per the rules. Logically there are several arguments which clearly explain how Rashford 'interferes' with play but none of those arguments or scenarios are mentioned in the rules.

    15. Joshua obaga on

      As a united fan I have to admit that united had an advantage because pep decided not to play Haaland. He's an incredible striker and would have caused united problems.

    16. Progress2success on

      The problem is that the refs aren’t accountable. They should come out and admit when they get it wrong, then we can say we all agree he was offside and a mistake was made. we now have one ref doing one thing this week, another doing the opposite the next and they are both right because neither them nor the fa point out which decision was right and which was wrong according to the laws of the game.

    18. Martin Odungide on

      Rashford literally changed direction and went after that ball which influenced the defenders and goalkeeper
      Ederson would've cleared that ball if rashford wasn't there

    22. londonladxxx on

      I’d say due to the the laws being so grey and so many people involved in the decisions now it was very smart play from Rashford and a nice finish from Bruno. If city had more than 1 attempt on target then this might not be such a big issue

    23. Ken Leung on

      There are other similar situations happened before
      Sanchez Goal v Chelsea in 2017 FA cup when Aaron Ramsey was offside
      Mirallas goal v Man Utd in 2014/15 PL match when Lukaku standing in the offside position

      Both occasion, both Lukaku & Ramsey are seems to be running toward the ball and very similar to Rashford situation.

      In my opinions, it is not blocking and interferring with the defender or goalkeeper. You should continue until whistle is blown

    24. pdscoelho on

      Haha had to laugh when they started saying how players are going to exploit this now and stand in an offside position to confuse defenders as if that's not always been a tactic in football for the longest time. Van Nistleroy was a master at coming back from an offside position.

      Only the city players can blame themselves for switching off because they've assumed an offside will be given. If one of the defenders or the keeper had actually run to the ball and been impeded by Rashford then they would have deemed it as interference. The truth is none of the city players got close enough to the ball where we can argue rash was shielding it, nor did Rashford obstruct the keepers vision of the ball at any point.

      City needed to show that Rashford was interfering by

    25. firminorules on

      In the 23rd min of Liv vs Brigthon, Trent was called for offsides, but Trent NEVER TOUCHED IT, and he did not even hardly make a play for it, he just stood there and watched it roll by 10 yds away from him. What about that? Hypocracy! Man U pays officials.

    27. Paul Kroczek on

      the keeper knows Rashford is offside so he should have just ignored him. Bruno was just about in the same position as Rasahford when he took the shot, so it shouldnt have affected keeper that much anyway/

    28. Manvir Singh on

      "The law was amended to actually counter that argument of whether he touches the ball or does he interfere with an opponent playing the ball," Walton said. "He (Rashford) does neither, so as the law stands, he hasn't done anything wrong. It's actually very good play from Rashford himself."

      Edit : Peter Walton former referee

    30. Karl Tam on

      so if i have 4 players in offside position and shield the ball (none of them touch the ball) and have another player kick it from an onside position , thats ok right ? as long as all the defense are not close and the keeper has a clear view ? btw, why the defender are far away was because the man utd player was miles offside. I am not a city supporter but this is not fair for any team if the offside rule is like this. Its clearly Rashford WAS INVOLVED in the player and he was at one point even attempted to strike the ball.

    Leave A Reply