A blessing for any Arsenal fan who has to deal with any spurs colleagues failure to understand the concept of “singular” and “plural”
ahmadtheanon on
Isn’t that discrimination? Or am I wrong?
Jusanom on
that’s insane
weems1974 on
From the text of the ruling: “Central to the legal issues in this case is a definitional task—establishing operational terminology for the key factors in place. Following this line of inquiry brings us,irrevocably, to a central question: what do we think of Tottenham?”
kilohe on
And we should miss out on making fun of them at work every week? That’s just silly
That is absolutely, no word of a lie, fucking batshit.
What is the world coming to?
ultrapurrple on
But not the other way round right?
123edcvfr456 on
As an Arsenal supporter and employment litigator, this is superb.
rtuaaa on
Such a clickbait headline when the original article is about something else totally.
No-Decision-6019 on
Bold of the judge to think there is harmony amongst Arsenal fans anyway
fahim-sabir on
This is madness. PC gone mad if you ask me.
What about the office bants?
Casual-Capybara on
Well of course they can, they’re Spurs fans, getting rejected is second nature for them.
Otherwise-Roll-2872 on
Segregation era policies for football fans in 2025 😂
Can we ban them from first class too?
Stones_Throw_Away_ on
Key bit people are missing:
> The judgement, however, was delivered with regards to a case that had nothing to do with support for football teams.
> Mr Wright was hearing a case brought to the court by Russian national Maia Kalina, who claimed that she was not hired by Digitas LBI during a final round of interviews because she was not outgoing and did not enjoy going to the pub.
> …
> Ms Hill told the tribunal the decision to hire another candidate “ultimately … came down to who was the better fit in the team”, adding that she “vibed” more with the other interviewee.
> He said: “We have two candidates who were both considered appointable. They were pretty evenly matched, with their own particular strengths. I see nothing wrong with looking at who would fit into the team better as long as the assessment is done with caution.”
The example about a Tottenham fan in a small office of Arsenal fans is an extreme example that the judge said would be lawful but probably not good for the business.
Silvertain on
im the only Arsenal fan amongst about 14 spuds , they still haven’t stopped going on about being “champions of Europe”
Optimal-Idea1558 on
I sincerely hope there is absolutely no quid pro quo here whatsoever
R82009 on
Being a Tottenham supporter is a clear sign of poor judgement so it should be used to disqualify candidates.
yourtoesinmymouth400 on
isn’t football and everything around it meant to be fun?
CrEdLover on
That’s stupid.
revjiggs on
Why stop here ? just stop employing totternham fans altogether. they clearly have bad taste 😉
25 Comments
That’s wild.
A blessing for any Arsenal fan who has to deal with any spurs colleagues failure to understand the concept of “singular” and “plural”
Isn’t that discrimination? Or am I wrong?
that’s insane
From the text of the ruling: “Central to the legal issues in this case is a definitional task—establishing operational terminology for the key factors in place. Following this line of inquiry brings us,irrevocably, to a central question: what do we think of Tottenham?”
And we should miss out on making fun of them at work every week? That’s just silly
[We can call our boss a dickhead](https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/sep/04/calling-your-boss-a-dickhead-is-not-a-sackable-offence-tribunal-rules) and now this.
https://preview.redd.it/15uijdy23dof1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4472a261665147a13dc0c6052e9afd762d5632f9
That is absolutely, no word of a lie, fucking batshit.
What is the world coming to?
But not the other way round right?
As an Arsenal supporter and employment litigator, this is superb.
Such a clickbait headline when the original article is about something else totally.
Bold of the judge to think there is harmony amongst Arsenal fans anyway
This is madness. PC gone mad if you ask me.
What about the office bants?
Well of course they can, they’re Spurs fans, getting rejected is second nature for them.
Segregation era policies for football fans in 2025 😂
Can we ban them from first class too?
Key bit people are missing:
> The judgement, however, was delivered with regards to a case that had nothing to do with support for football teams.
> Mr Wright was hearing a case brought to the court by Russian national Maia Kalina, who claimed that she was not hired by Digitas LBI during a final round of interviews because she was not outgoing and did not enjoy going to the pub.
> …
> Ms Hill told the tribunal the decision to hire another candidate “ultimately … came down to who was the better fit in the team”, adding that she “vibed” more with the other interviewee.
> He said: “We have two candidates who were both considered appointable. They were pretty evenly matched, with their own particular strengths. I see nothing wrong with looking at who would fit into the team better as long as the assessment is done with caution.”
The example about a Tottenham fan in a small office of Arsenal fans is an extreme example that the judge said would be lawful but probably not good for the business.
im the only Arsenal fan amongst about 14 spuds , they still haven’t stopped going on about being “champions of Europe”
I sincerely hope there is absolutely no quid pro quo here whatsoever
Being a Tottenham supporter is a clear sign of poor judgement so it should be used to disqualify candidates.
isn’t football and everything around it meant to be fun?
That’s stupid.
Why stop here ? just stop employing totternham fans altogether. they clearly have bad taste 😉
All is right with the cosmos
