CHELSEA NEWS UPDATE

Fulham have included Josh King’s ‘goal’ against Chelsea in their club Goal of the Month vote.

King’s goal at Stamford Bridge was ruled out after a VAR intervention, which the PGMOL have since said was a mistake.

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO4zAEalcvN0VrwMXL-tGSQ/join

#cfc #chelsea #chelseafc #chelseafootballclub #chelseanews #chelseatransfer #chelseatransfersnews #fabrizioromano #pochettino #mauriciopochettino #toddboehly #enzofernández #nicolasjackson #reecejames #raheemsterling #colepalmer #benchilwell #stamfordbridge #mudryk #moisescaicedo #thiagosilva #levicolwill #badiashile #disasi #malogusto #cucurella #conorgallagher

***PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO MY 2nd CHANNEL – MIZ TV TOTAL FOOTBALL***

Link 👉 https://www.youtube.com/@miztvtotalfootball

Follow me on all social media below:

🐤Twitter 👉 https://twitter.com/TOSOTC_CFC
📲Discord 👉 https://t.co/qnWjybswTg
📷Instagram 👉 https://www.instagram.com/tosotc.cfc

21 Comments

  1. Muniz unintentionally trod on Chalobah's foot, the officials deemed it a foul, unlucky for fulham. Frustration acknowledged. Lucky for us. Let's move on. We don't even complain beyond the final whistle when we are constantly hard done by, if we get a lucky call, it's a shock to the system. When the darling clubs get lucky decisions, sweep it under the carpet.

  2. Ofcourse it was 200% foul on Chaloba. It's terrible that some Chelsea fans are saying it was an accident. Shame on them. Like you rightly said, alot of fouls happen accidentally and are considered as fouls. I'm so disappointed with some Chelsea fans over this

  3. i dont get what your problem is?? is it not enough you got 3 points which you didnt deserve?? you still have an issue when pgmol itself said it was a mistake. wow look at the entitlement of you guys.

  4. This is my first time seeing someone who shares my opinion of that play being a clear foul. My argument with those who say that's not a foul is "will that be given as a penalty if a defender did it inside the 18-yard area?" I'm sure the answer is a yes, and nobody will contest it. So, why is it not a foul when a clear foul has occurred? Most fouls are not intentional, but are still fouls. Do people who stamp on people go out on the pitch with a determination to stamp on a player during a match and be sent off? I believe the answer is a "NO".

  5. ya all need to stop defending that decision against fulham. it was not a foul. any football fan who thinks thats a foul has completely lost what football is about. Fulham got done by in that match. their first goal was correct. our first goal was scored 1 min after extra time, our second goal was jao pedro's hand ball before their hand ball. they got bullied by bad officiating and u dont need to do all this pathetic defending of it