Two European finals and a World Cup semi-final- does Southgate deserve more praise than he’s given by many?

Share.

11 Comments

  1. So with the team he had what are you saying.. Southgate' overachieved or the players aren't good enough… SOUTHGATE IS CRAP HANDS DOWN…example of that is..Spain won Back to European championships sandwiched within a world cup triumph….they then lost that team through age and built another one in the time that we still praise coming second as an achievement… I'll drop my own microphone ๐Ÿ˜‰.

  2. International football standards have dropped dramatically. Thereโ€™s so many average players. England only needed above average players to reach 2 finals. It had nothing do with Southgate.

  3. This is the best ever England side in terms of what this team looks like on paper compared to the competition.

    Itโ€™s obviously not as good as the 2004 or 2006 squads but in 2004 you were up against very very strong France, Spain, Germany, Brazil etc.
    Today the England side was the best on paper in the Euros and we stunk the place out and scraped through very early draws, before being played off the pitch by Spain.

    A top class manager would have won something. Thatโ€™s why we are annoyed.

  4. What does limited mean? Play any way you want but win. Southgate has done well but he did not win. He should have beaten Croatia. He should have beaten Italy. Yes, he did better than most. But he did not win. Nobody cares how you play as long as you win. Spain with Xavi were limited; but they won.

  5. Y'all with shit on a national team that hasnt won shit since 1966 and still expect them to turn that shit into gold. Ya'll dont even have the culture to win, just entitlement based on nothing.