Share.

22 Comments

  1. Palmer is not better than saka.
    When palmer ghosting no1 says a word.

    Saka needs perform in the ucl before we can call him wc but you know what palmer doesn’t

  2. When Saka and Palmer start doing Mo Salah numbers and perform week in week out year in year out at the highest level in the league and Europe then il start properly rating these man. Until then they are just very very good young players.Come chat to me after 5 years.

  3. Be honest if they swapped teams (Palmer on Arsenal and Saka on Chelsea) who’s team would be better. Personally I don’t think saka could do what Palmer does for Chelsea but Palmer could do what saka does for arsenal. Both players are class tho just my opinion

  4. I think it's close but Palmer edges it for what he's done in the past 2 seasons + what he did in the Euro & FIFA CWC finals (club + country).
    He'll be clear when he does it in the UCL consistently.

  5. Palmer & Saka – The main differences:

    Top Academy: Palmer 9/10 Saka 8/10
    Athleticism: Palmer 7/10 Saka 9/10
    Technical: 8/10 8/10
    IQ: 8/10 8/10
    Chemical X: ✅ ❌

  6. On their day, any top player can be better than Saka for a period, but in terms of longevity & consistency, min. 7/10 every game & producing impact moments, no-one under 25 is close. When someone has a purple patch or a good season, they compare him to Saka. That says it all.

  7. U all just don't know what u are saying at all . U just seat there talking nonsense…. Total nonsense what is he wins trophy s like he is the only one playing and won the trophy.. u just need to go look at playing rate and all before u bring this up again