➤ Younes H-Hamou: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmpDCiPCBkXlqWnov3AI66g
➤ YTF Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/younestalksfootball
➤ YTF Twitter: https://twitter.com/ytalksfootball
➤ YTF TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@younestalksfootbal
➤ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/youneshhamou
➤ Twitter: https://twitter.com/younestalks

➢ Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7AiAq4zB5ylQy23gg3H8hA/join

Welcome to the Younes Talks Football channel! The channel where I discuss all things football (slight bias towards Chelsea) with 100% rawness and honesty! I say it like it is so you know what you’re getting with me! This is the place to have fun, bring positive vibes and discuss football from a new perspective. Welcome on board this journey…

29 Comments

  1. I think theres a good player in Felix but he needs a top class manager to get it out of him. I doubt our current guy is the man for that.

  2. Of course, Felix is keen to come to Chelsea because no one else is keen to take him. Player, who was expected to become a big deal, is unwanted and going from loan to loan without impressing anyone.

  3. Lets be honest, chiesa and Neto will get injured. Have to have one reliable Lw on the squad. Although if we get osimen then Nico can play lw. Plus with Felix, christo can even play lw if needed. Younas you might be onto something!

  4. Younes if you see in a way the 1st year they had all the players who didn't want to be there and they couldn't kove them on that window or in January.. they bought few players for tuchel which are all shit.. so basically I don't really count that 1st season

  5. I find the wording on those debriefs very interesting. Chelsea willing to go after Osimhen "on their terms". I'm interpreting "their terms" as meaning Chelsea are not prepared to break their wage structure to sign Viktor so it'll have to be Viktor that compromises and lowers his salary demands.
    For Chelsea to give in to Osimhen's salary demands of 11/12 million per year, (210-231k/week) it will break Chelsea owners ambition on a strict wage structure of 150k/week.
    In addition to that, it has the potential side effect of pushing players like Palmer and perhaps others to become disgruntled employees, especially Palmer who just signed his pay bumper deal this past week which was reportedly to be for 130k/week.
    This chain of events could trigger Palmer seeking another pay raise equal to Osimhen and if we follow this domino effect out, hypothetically of course, other players will ask for more after Palmer, etc etc.
    In addition to all of this – Osimhen coming to Chelsea effectively benches Clearlake favourite Nicholas Jackson who the club was recently boasting was valued nearly 80 million.
    Would Chelsea be prepared to bench Jackson, potentially cashing in on the player prematurely? Remember several weeks ago we were all briefed that Chelsea did not want to replace Jackson at striker, only bring in some help for him instead.
    Either the reports then were inaccurate or Chelsea has done a 180 and now want to replace Jackson at striker.
    In order to replace Jackson at striker, they need to spend big on the transfer fee, break their wage structure and run the risk of a chain reaction of players either disgruntled and/or requesting wage increases as a direct result.
    For these reasons, I don't see Chelsea signing Osimhen unless – "their terms" comes to fruition meaning, Viktor reduces his wages to an acceptable figure to which Clearlake can agree to it without any of the potential side effects explained above.
    I have a feeling that's exactly what the report today was referring to "Chelsea want Osimhen on their terms".
    In regards to Sterling and Chiesa swap – this is interesting. It didn't elaborate on what wall they ran into in the discussion of the players switching sides. If I had to speculate here, I'd say the wall they ran into was Sterling enjoying living in London, with his family on 325k/week. What's the incentive to move his family to Turin? I don't see any pressure being put on him to leave and as long as Mudryk is his primary form of competition, he'll continue to get minutes. I personally don't see Neto being particularly efficient from the left, doesn't play there often as a quick look up on Football Critic showed he's played just twice there in the past 50 matches. Anytime I watched Wolves play, if Neto was actually playing, it was always on the right.
    I would imagine Juventus and Chelsea could restart this discussion again in the near future only if Sterling was on board with moving, otherwise, I suspect we won't hear this again – and that is if it's even true or not. Bit of a left field this one by Di Marzio.
    As for the theory Chelsea will play the long game and get their man to compromise – I doubt this is a successful strategy when other clubs still want Viktor. If Napoli lower their valuation, Arsenal will be all over it and personal terms wouldn't be an issue.
    Also, despite PSG "exiting" the race for Osimhen, the player reportedly (ESPN/Plettenberg) have said Osimhen wants the PSG move so hard to rule out PSG until it's actually over.
    I personally can't see Osimhen deal happening as personal terms are not practical and neither is replacing Jackson by moving him to the bench.

  6. Jorgensen gusto fofana tosin cucurella caicedo enzo felix nkunku palmer oshimen that would be great but too open to play top 4 id rather caicedo lavia enzo palmer oshimen nkunku

  7. We will wait til Deadline day since we have 4 matches til then.. if we are scoring then Osimhm valve will drop alot. His valve won't go up.. it would be a win win for Chelsea either way.

  8. If they can't sell Chelsea they will just dell BlueCo to get out of the football business completely after doing their business, one crazy loophole😅

Leave A Reply