🚨 BREAKING: Man City Shifts Focus! Mohammed Kudus Targeted Over Lucas Paqueta | Full Transfer Details 🚨

In a surprising twist to the transfer saga, Manchester City have now set their sights on West Ham’s Mohammed Kudus, sidelining their initial interest in Lucas Paqueta. Both players reportedly have £85m release clauses, but City’s preference for Kudus adds a new layer of intrigue. Dive into the details of this potential move, why Kudus may be favored, and what this means for West Ham as they face the challenge of retaining their star midfielder.

🔹 Why Manchester City prefers Kudus over Paqueta
🔹 Details on Kudus’ release clause and what it means for West Ham
🔹 The implications for West Ham’s squad and future transfer strategies

Stay tuned as we break down the strategies, financials, and potential outcomes of this significant transfer development. Subscribe for more updates on the latest transfer news and expert analysis on all things football.

DOWNLOAD MATCH BINGO HERE 👇👇👇👇👇
https://matchbingo.sng.link/Amdnf/cs1r/ui93

Thanks to our channel sponsors for the support: https://www.etcsports.co.uk/

Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hammerschat

Email us at hammerschat@gmail.com

Our online store: https://hammerschatstore.com/

#ManchesterCity #MohammedKudus #TransferNews #LucasPaqueta #PremierLeague #FootballTransfers #WestHam #ManCityTransfers #FootballNews #SoccerUpdates
#WestHam
#WHUFC

Good for Nothing Safety by Twin Musicom is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

36 Comments

  1. If a club doesn't want to sell a player then I have no idea why they'd tell anybody that there's a release clause. Let alone a journalist who's going to go tell everybody??

  2. the release clause is for 2025 not this summer for Christ sake and Kudus will be ruined at City and they don't need him
    I Liverpool wont pay more than 70M for a player
    2 I think Kudus is looking at A Real Madrid move
    3 I look at a lot of other fan sites and there been nothing from City regarding Kudus it probably some ITK making rubbish up

  3. I don't think City will be buying anyone of note. The charges against them with the hearing in November are so serious they could in deep trouble. It's why they've started their own claim against the FA. Very much watch this space.

    The FA are citing Swindon doing the same back in the 90's as a precedent. They were relegated two divisions, reduced to one on appeal.

  4. I think that it would be good if Lukas, if he is not convicted, if there is an offer from Saudi Arabia, he should be sold for some 90 million plus bonuses, but he would not sell Kudusa.

  5. I guess how West Ham brace themselves against this Man City raid depends on if they come wielding axes, swords and spears or more like the missus with the credit card on boxing day waiting for Selfridges to open their doors

  6. No sympathy for Paqueta that they choose Kudus over him (if the scandal is true) he has brought it on himself and cost us a fortune

  7. It’s becoming increasingly more likely that at least half of our budget relied on the Paquetta sale. That’s fallen through and now they have put Kudos in the shop window. Is there a clause? Who knows but either way Steidten is leaking there is and there is only one reason to that. To sell Kudos without the fans kicking off. We have already bought his replacement.

  8. My Arsenal supporting friend told me they want Kudus as well. If he stays with us next season he should be held up as a folk hero for sticking with us. Everyone knows he is among the best in the league.

  9. Southgate should have gone after the World Cup.Just like Moyes he makes class players look like Championship strugglers.A wasted generation that even Rice can’t sparkle.

  10. Nobody is gonna pay 85m for him this summer. Although my confidence in this summer window going well is starting to diminish quickly.

  11. The final part of Plattenberg's tweet is somewhat concerning. He says that the release clause can be activated AT ANY TIME, not just next summer. That suggests that it is open and effective for the duration of Kudus' contract.

  12. Do you think the club have known for a while..? Guilherme is said to be a future Kudus replacement, maybe the really near future 😬 I think that's why we are still looking at wingers – Wesley etc – I'd rather Paquetá went to City then Kudus 100% and that's the truth..!

  13. It astounds me when people say nobody would pay £85m for Kudus
    Well if they want him they have to
    Just like everyone laughed when West Ham valued Rice above £100m
    And Arsenal paid it & Man City bid too 👏🏼

  14. No issues with buy out clauses if a decent level….with kudus only around 10 clubs in Europe can afford him and financial restrictions may stop even the premier league teams ……. Kudus is totally different from de brynne ……so cannot see him as a replacement for him……but I could see Liverpool wanting him to replace salah……. Paqueta is in my opinion the natural replacement for KDB but obviously not going anywhere while investigation is ongoing……be interesting to see how pans out …..I think Louise G will be a lot further developed than we expect and we cannot afford to pay that money and stick him in u21 and bench …..I also think the J LO factor will help with a change of style……a busy summer

  15. Sorry I'm off topic but I remember you mentioning about secure VPN ? Was it surf shark? Just spent 40 notes on a Spanish phone chip as I rinsed my UK data watching euro 24 now I can't watch itv or bbc ( can't catch a break lol ) BTW I'm in spain for next month grafting and have been for 2 weeks. Please help. Cheers boys, long time subscriber COYI

Leave A Reply