FIRST CRICKET TEST 2004 , Kingston Jamaica. West Indies all out for 47 from 41 for 5. Steve Harmison rips apart West Indies as he takes 7 for 12. 7/12. Umbrella field. The series where Brian Lara made 400 not out at Antigua. The fast bowler’s perfect line and length was too good for the West Indies batsmen as they capitulated to their lowest ever Test total of 47.
Harmison became the most successful bowler in Sabina Park history when he took 7-12 as he stunned the home crowd.

England wrapped up an unbelievable win before lunch to lead the series 1-0.
When both Chris Gayle and Smith walked into the middle to resume West Indies’ second innings, no one, not even Harmison could have in their wildest of dreams imagined the Ashington Express scalping 7 for 12.

With initial pressure being built up by Hoggard and Harmison, something had to give. Gayle, not known to play with steady perfection was the one to succumb to the pressure. To some extent, he threw his wicket away by attempting a forceful shot off the back-foot, only the ever agile Graham Thorpe to take a fine catch in the slip cordon.

Harmison’s next wicket was that of Ramnaresh Sarwan. By then, Harmison had gradually increased his pace and he got one to cut back sharply with almost geometric-like precision to trap him lbw. Arguably, it could have missed the stumps, but that deadly combination of pace and bounce was compelling to watch.

Chanderpaul was done in by high pace and more so disconcerting bounce from a good length. The red cherry hit the slice of the bat and his stumps went for a walk in the park. The wicketkeeper-batsman, Ridley Jacobs arguably got the ball of the match. It was a snorter of a delivery from Harmison that kicked of a length and Jacobs had no other option, but to fend it off to the short-leg fielder, Hussain to complete an easy catch. The ball to Jacobs wasn’t one of the quickest deliveries bowled by Harmison. But any bowler who forces the batsman to make that slight adjustment by moving it off the pitch, in the air or producing bounce appears to be quicker than what the speed gun says.

Those poor tail-enders in the West Indies camp must have felt as if there was a volcano erupting from the track, as they were nothing more than sitting ducks against Harmison. The umbrella field set by captain Vaughan with only Hussain fielding in front of the wicket seemed like a sweet revenge for all those embarrassing defeats that England suffered at the hands of ruthless West Indies sides of the 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s. Incidentally, 10 years ago in 1994 at Port of Spain, Trinidad, Curtly Ambrose had glided smoothly into the crease to create havoc in the English ranks. Now, Harmison was dishing out something similar at the West Indies camp. As Michael Holding famously said in the commentary box β€œThis is the first time I have seen such a field by England.”

The primal force of the pace attack, Harmison landed the final nail in the coffin by dismissing the last man, Edwards, neatly caught by Trescothick in the slips. West Indies’ total of 47 was their lowest ever in their annals of cricket history. Harmison’s heart-stirring figures of 7 for 12 was the third-cheapest ever in an innings. Trescothick and Vaughan strolled towards the paltry target of 20 runs in a mere 2 overs to script a soul-lifting victory for England.

Harmison won plaudits for his ability to bowl at blistering speed and make the batsmen hop and duck with snorters whistling past their noses. In fact, 2004 was an annus mirabilis for him, as he went onto become the No. 1 ranked bowler in world cricket. Eventually, on the back of their pace attack, England won their first series in West Indies for more than 30 years.

47 Comments

  1. Nice to have stumbled on this, thanks!
    Several pleasant memories. Harmy of course, Gayle playing Test Cricket, perfect seam position from…oh, a youthful Simon jones, and Nasser fielding at short leg!

  2. Steve Harmison never came close to fulfilling his potential in my opinion. Aside from this series, he generally didn't play well away from home and wasn't good in pressure situations.

    He could be devastating in the right conditions and did so very well for Durham but his England career was unfulfilling, aside from a few performances.

    I actually lost some respect from him when England were thrased 5-0 in the 2006/07 Ashes series in Australia and he couldn't hide his glee in an interview with Michael Atherton about going home and retiring from ODIs at only 28 years old. When Atherton asked him how he would prepare for the summer series, he simple said "Don't know ask the coach."

    For the next 2 years I often thought he was only selected because he was Flintoff and other Eng players' mate. It's no secret Flintoff was only made captain in the 2006/07 Ashes series because it was felt he could get the best out of Harmison.

    As a pundit he strikes me as likeable, endearing and sincere so maybe that's why his team mates liked having him around . He had such potential and was a lethal bowler for Durham. However, aside from a few games for England he didn't fulfill his potential and didn't travel well (this clip being an exception). I guess I have more respect and admiration for those who do make it with successful careers at international level which us tough.

  3. Test cricket during this period was something else. There were legends in every team and cricket was fierce and competitive. Back then, I used to watch test cricket ball by ball and now I don't watch cricket at all.

  4. Im happy to see Ramnaresh sarwan and Shivnarine chanderpaul are going scoreless..they play with India as if they don't wanna get out..thinking India's pace attack is weak…

  5. 5.26 , not sure how can England not set a field like this before 2004 : Michael Holding ….England had world class seamers , who could bowl outsiwng : Paul Allot , Bob Willis , Fred Trueman, Ian Botham , and the later Dominic Cork, Andy Caddick , Dean Headly ( i guess i named mostly all prior to 2004 )

Leave A Reply