Cristian Romero Red Card vs Chelsea, Cole Palmer Penalty Goal, Tottenham vs Chelsea

20 Comments

  1. A striker shoots and scores a goal, but on the follow through of the shot treds on a defender. Is that a red?

    Fernandez clearly at fault for putting himself in a situation to get hurt from a challenege.

    If you think thats a red card, you're a woke football fan.

  2. Romero won the ball fairly, his follow through clattered but there's no way it's a foul or a sending off. Someone was cheating. It's a problem, the VAR must be prevented from knowing the teams and players involved. Technology is required which hides the shirt colour and players face because referees will and do cheat whether they want to or not.

  3. I think it's about time he admits to his to his red card and the problems he brings with it. I represented him as a stand out player this season without any many yellows just own it and keep a level ahead.

  4. If you wanted to do an honest review, you'd show the actual video. It clearly shows he took the ball first. You've neglected to show that anywhere in this video

  5. Shame on you for cutting out the images prior to the ones you are showing. It wasn't a challenge! He cleared the ball away and caught him on the follow through. Still, I think Romero knew exactly what he was doing – who clears a ball from the box side footed? I can't say I have ever seen a defender try to clear a ball out of harms way like that with a pass. Also, who side foots a ball and then slides on his follow through? This is typical Romero, he was aggrieved because he didn't get any calls in his favour (Taylor never does for Tott) and then started behaving like a madman.

  6. not a single shot of Romero kicking the ball, all the shots were taken after he hit the ball and his foot met the Chelsea player's foot. This is a very biased presentation of information in order to accept the only point of view that justifies the award of a penalty. A very biased analysis. Minus

  7. It was a very good challenge – Romero won the ball – only the follow through caught the other player. Any player of any sport knows a hard challenge or hit has a follow through. Can you imagine a ref saying this to Tyson: 'Mike, the uppercut was superb. It's the follow through I object to. You could have taken your opponent's head off. ' Tyson: 'no uppercut worth the name uppercut has no follow through.' No hard challenge in football has no momentum. Besides the Chelsea stood there like a post. What is Romero supposed to do? Twist his foot under himself and snap his own ankle? Ridiculous. In this case the Ref got it all wrong and penalised Romero on reputation not the act itself.

  8. This isn't the first time referee Oliver has decided to take any payoff and has done such things. He's not really qualified as a referee. He shamed himself of a fair game. The truth is that only the Fifa official and himself who gave the order will know, but he will live by acknowledging that he is not the right person until he dies.

  9. The Oliver referee has forced Tottenham to lose almost every decision except that scene. He has committed several gross misjudgment only to the home team, with reasonable suspicion that he would have been paid any price. I already know that FIFA and EPL will appoint him as the referee for more important games because they deserve to be fired immediately but FIFA and EPL are bugs that put money before fairness.

  10. Romero is a good defender but not elite level. Elite level defenders always rely on their reading skills and intelligence to win the ball back standing.

Leave A Reply