Replacing Mount & Havertz With Palmer Was GENIUS By Chelsea!

Share.

20 Comments

  1. Yeah, buyin Cole Palmer was a genius move.. He's a betta player than Havertz or Mount. An neither av them 2 improve, or are doin anything at Man Utd or Arsenal. That's great business 2me..

  2. Spent 2 seasons trying to convince 3 content creators.. that Havertz would never become the player that people think is in his person.. mount was another, who never really played to his potential. So now I will give you another pair.. that are not "up to it.. Sterling and Gallagher..

  3. I feel so vindicated on my opinions on mount and havertz, I’m happy they’re flopping at their new clubs, at Chelsea they were offered unrivalled levels of protection love and patience happy we don’t have those divisive players and have Palmer, he’s looking really promising

  4. Cole Palmer :::: would not get in the city team ? He would not get in previous good Chelsea squads , all you university players and journalists, he’s decent that’s it , No pace ! Sell

  5. So many average and poor performances yet nearly always starting and the irony is that they will go down famously in Chelsea history for that initial Tuchel boost and a good cup run (his specialty) that led to the CL and ensuing SC and CWC. I feel for them now though as expectations are (unrealistically) high as 'Chelsea stars'. It's as if Mount got bored with his own energetic but rather artless football and I never knew wtf Havertz was or what he was doing (at Chelsea). Hopefully it works out for them (somewhere or other) though.

Leave A Reply