Share.

32 Comments

  1. Tbh I am really enjoying this implosion
    It is a dagger to the hearts of these clueless owners

  2. everyhearthstone on

    Palmer: 0/3 accurate crosses, 0/4 shots on target, 1/3 dribbles successful, 2/7 duels won, 8 times lost possession, 1 error leading to a shot

  3. istilllovemata on

    Delap, Gittens and Garnacho for £130m but it’s fucking obvious we’re bulding one if the best teams in the world

  4. BrickedCamel on

    😂😂 bro said he goes to training early and stays late and performs like this, thinks he’s Cristiano with the ability of a melon

  5. Zandermagoolies on

    Really poor performance, but let’s not make him a scapegoat. Palmer, Neto and Delap did absolutely fuck all either tonight. Not as poor obviously.

  6. Genuinely one of the worst performances I think I’ve ever seen.

    Ironically for the one good thing he did, which was a brilliant dribble past a few players and a good ball into the box, none of the players even tried to get on the end of it.

  7. NovigradScientist on

    One of the reasons why I blame the sporting directors more than Rosenior (who isn’t blameless)

    He barely beat a man and ruined so many attacks

  8. TheRedPillMonk on

    And Winstanley insisted that we should get him instead of Cherki…

    And the scary part? I think Gittens is worse!

  9. 40 million feels like a scam at this point. Congrats to the Blueco positivity larpers on this sub (we know who they are)

  10. Everyone knew he would be bad, except these sporting directors. At one point I thought it was so obvious it wasnt going to be a good signing that maybe he’d actually be decent but he’s been worse than I expect and I expected nothing. We signed him bc he was a “market opportunity” and not because he was a player we need and this is a HUGE concern

  11. mr_ordinaryboy on

    Manchester United probably laughed in tears when they strucked a deal with us and wondered what our SD’s saw in him

  12. Series_Informal on

    I remember chelsea fans saying man utd was the problem and he would do much better here, and he didn’t deserve the hate he gets. Look where we are now

  13. He was awful but it’s funny that when you look at the stats they’re weirdly not bad because all he did was pass it backwards. For example your last stay isn’t bad at all, Palmer lost it 8, Neto 15, Fernandez 13.

  14. neighborhood_s on

    I will never understand anyone who rates Garnacho as a footballer.

    I see them bring up his G/A, they always fail to mention 6 of his 5 goals have Cardiff, Qarabag, Port Vale and Wrexham.

    1 goal in the prem in 22 league games, this guy is far of Chelsea level and never should of worn a Chelsea shirt to begin with.

  15. Panini_Grande on

    Take the loss and rip up his contract. We’d have been better with 10 men today

  16. I thought he was very poor, but tactically we set him up to fail.

    We continued on the same tactics the whole match, inverted fulbacks in the channels and garnacho was out wide. Not one time did anyone overlap him.

    That’s not a defence of Garnacho’s performance but it offered him nothing to work with. Cucurella would be threat on the overlap and it would give Garnacho options.

    I didn’t see any tactical thinking by Rosenior to change that game at all.

  17. EstevaosJesusPiece on

    Kinda dumb post because he only played about 20 minutes in the first half and a decent chunk was out of position

  18. Anyone with a brain knew this signing was straight up ass. But he’s worse than I ever imagined.