Close Menu
    [Paul Joyce] Liverpool ranks 4th in football agent fees for the period of 4th February 2025 to 2nd February 2026.
    Liverpool

    [Paul Joyce] Liverpool ranks 4th in football agent fees for the period of 4th February 2025 to 2nd February 2026.

    Share.
    View 29 Comments

    29 Comments

    3. goingpt on

      Jesus Christ. Look at Chelsea there…

      I know they’ve made a load of signings but there’s definitely some shady dealings going on there.

      Someone should investigate them and punish them accordingly…

    5. hokageace on

      I don’t understand how footballers allow the agent fees to be this big. So much of that money should be going to their own pocket instead they go to an overglorified negotiator.

    7. ashwinsalian on

      and chelsea have a history of undisclosed and under the table agent fees so this is all that they’ve disclosed

    8. malushanks95 on

      Wtf are Chelsea doing? No wonder they’ve recorded the biggest pre-tax loss in PL history this year.

    11. julesharvey1 on

      I read it initially that Bournemouth were top and thought what the hell have they been up to but then realised it is in alphabetical order. 😂

    16. Britz10 on

      And there is the reason we didn’t win the league in Klopp’s final season. Chelsea are spending insane amounts on agent fees, we were never going to turn whoever is Caicedo’s agent’s head.

    18. runandjump13 on

      Feels bad man.

      But I guess it goes with the fact of the huge summer spend, as they are broadly related to transaction fee.

    19. JGlover92 on

      Mad that we spent an insane amount and broke the transfer record twice but still only 4th. Just shows how ridiculous Chelsea and City’s cheating is

    21. llinoscarpe on

      Really it’s more interesting to calculate it per capita in relation to money spent, Liverpool and Chelsea spent similar amounts yet Chelsea spent double on agents fees

    22. ymaohyd69 on

      Doesn’t look like we paid an agent’s fee for Wirtz weirdly, the follow-up PDF on the FA doesn’t have anything against his name

    24. Quinn_XXVII on

      Chelsea’s bill is outstanding

      Villa though, that’s alarming

      Looks like the Leeds Utd 2000-02 experience

    25. Quinn_XXVII on

      By expenditure

      HERE GOES

      in figures published by the FA, between February 4, 2025 to February 2, 2026.

      CLUB – NET TOTAL

      1: CHELSEA – £65,102,247

      2: ASTON VILLA – £38,444,289

      3: MANCHESTER CITY – £37,358,301

      4: LIVERPOOL – £33,881,544

      5: ARSENAL – £32,149,359

      6: MANCHESTER UNITED – £31,777,462

      7: WOLVERHAMPTON WANDERERS – £25,960,372

      8: TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR – £21,384,701

      9: AFC BOURNEMOUTH – £20,883,523

      10: NEWCASTLE UNITED – £20,284,806

      11: BRIGHTON & HOVE ALBION – £19,520,800

      12: WEST HAM UNITED – £18,348,058

      13: CRYSTAL PALACE – £16,848,734

      14: LEEDS UNITED – £13,990,935

      15: BRENTFORD – £12,743,523

      16: NOTTINGHAM FOREST – £12,210,822

      17: FULHAM – £11,434,784

      18: SUNDERLAND – £10,627,772

      19: EVERTON – £9,990,374

      20: BURNLEY – £7,357,902

      TOTAL – £460,300,308

    27. Heem1422 on

      I really don’t understand why agents take a cut of anything. The club wants the player, the player wants the club. Why are agents getting a cut of something that would probably happen without their involvement? Negotiate the player’s terms maybe, but I get the feeling players can gauge their own value, and even that could proceed without an agent.