Genuine question: What’s the rule about blocking the keeper’s view? Why was one a goal and the other one not?

Alright first of all, starting a thread with the likes of “yeah he’s X/it’s team Y so that’s why” is plain dumbness and immaturity worthy of a 12yo, at 13yo you usually stop with that bs.
That said, regarding this useless post, a [Google search](https://www.goal.com/it/liste/moviola-inter-cremonese-rigore-espulsione-episodi-var/blt797201206c3b680a) would’ve helped your case. Can you read it out loud for all of us?

Im not going to act like an expert but koopmeiners was legit in front of the keeper while lautaro seemed far enough and was on a run

edit: thuram*

It changes depending on the dynamics of the offside player. In the case of Thuram, the player is steady in an offside position at the moment of the shoot, blocking the keepers view for a long period of time.
Dimarco shots is initially in clear view from the keeper and Lautaro, running towards the goal, ends up obstructing the shot later, when the position is not considered “active”.

Both should not be goals especially if a player has to jump out of the way

https://preview.redd.it/sd4syiirnhig1.png?width=767&format=png&auto=webp&s=83e24eb338eb2c19c0db6309aaa908899d9cf013

First of all there will always be different calls on same-ish situations. Second of all, I’m and Inter fan, so maybe biased. But to me the offside player is differently placed with regard to the keeper and the ball/player kicking.

Marotta League

The rule is whatever the fuck refs want it to be on case based.

They are both around the 6th yard box and both keepers are a little in front of the line so I’m not sure why people are saying they are in completely positions.

That being said, Thurman, most definitely lifts a legs up a bit and while he doesn’t touch the ball, he definitely interferes with the play in that moment. A miss shot, can still interfere with play.

But I don’t think there’s any concrete rules on when this is or isn’t considered blocking the keepers view point. The EPL had this issue earlier in the year where on was counted and the other discounted. It always just comes down to what the ref on that particular day decides

They are both offside, Lautaro had to jump to make sure not to touch the ball.

The offside rule change was a mistake I don’t care if you do something or not. Offside is offside and this change made the difference to be active or passive up to the referee instead of having a clear indication

Koopmainers scored, is that enough motivation for you? 😂

Juve’s was offside cos Juve are losers.