
As Arsenal spent almost the whole second half of their 3-2 defeat to Manchester United chasing an equaliser, it never seemed likely they would create a clear-cut chance from open play. Arsenal are able to dominate possession, and to record a regular stream of goals from set pieces. But Arsenal’s inability to score goals from open play remains highly unusual for a side top of the table.
Take away penalties, set pieces and own goals, and they’ve managed only 22 goals from 23 matches this season. Manchester City (36), Liverpool (28), Manchester United (26), Aston Villa (24), Bournemouth (24), and Brentford (24) have all managed more, and Chelsea have managed the same number. This is despite Arsenal having the widest range of attacking options in the Premier League.
This is a period of football in which squad depth is vaunted like never before — it’s the five-substitutes era, and Mikel Arteta’s attempt to get back into the game yesterday involved a quadruple substitution, which would have been literally impossible until 2020. In that sense, football has changed. But equally, Arsenal are lacking a single outstanding attacker this season. And while there’s no particular need for one single attacker to dominate in terms of goalscoring, it’s very rare for a side to win the title without one standout attacker having an excellent individual campaign.
As a very general rule — backed up by an academic paper written by the late Garry Gelade, a Cambridge graduate who played an influential role in the development of football analytics — the quality of a side’s defence is determined more by the weakest defensive player, but the quality of a side’s attack is determined more by its strongest attacking player.
That basically makes sense. Defending is largely reactive, and opponents are able to target one player or zone. Attacking is proactive, and you can attempt to work the ball into your best attacker. But who is Arsenal’s best attacker?
(The article continues, and ends with this:)
Ultimately, Arsenal’s current approach has taken them to the top of the table: four points clear, and favourites for the title. But it feels like Arteta’s side will, at some point this season, require a burst of brilliance from an attacking player: the equivalent of Marc Overmars’ run-in in 1997-98, of Freddie Ljungberg’s in 2001-02. Lots of Arsenal’s attackers have it in them, and have shown that level within this system previously.
Link to the paper:
by Choobeen

1 Comment
Sorry stopped reading when I got to actual numbers of other teams, with the exception of city everyone is rather close to Arsenal for open play out put, despite the fact that we are considered by many to atrocious from open play, does this not show every other team should be facing the same scrutiny? I’ll be the first to admit our style of play is awful to watch in the league and I so wish we played like the 22/23 season when we actually went after teams but it may also be a consequence of how teams set up. Albeit that’s an easy out for the fact that we bought a striker and refuse to service him in favour of dire possession control. I’m not sure even winning the league will make this year enjoyable at this rate. I’d rather everyone be more gung-ho but clubs are seen internally as more of a business than ever and risk averse play that guarantees income sustained over success.
Although I can’t even blame our owners, they’ve coughed up the deepest squad in the league and we’re still risk averse 😭