Now obviously it's just a picture that can't capture the entire incident but it's the one used in the article.
Obviously intentional yanks on someone's hair would be a red but the lack of common sense on this one just gets me. It was a surprise when it was given…. but then I'm even more perplexed that it went to a panel of people who agreed with the decision.
Never the less the result of the game didn't change. Our record with Michael kean isn't great anyway lol.
by NOTsoPnuematic
10 Comments
Ah lads this is getting embarassing
I’m much more aggrieved by the fairly stonewall red card challenge on Armstrong being missed tbh
He pulled his hair end of story.
It doesnt matter that it wasn’t hard or he didn’t mean to, thems the rules.
Get over it and enjoy the fact it means we can’t play JOB at right back for three games.
Hahaha wtf.
Lads I’m not happy about the ban but this post is rubbish.
Okay? But he does have long hair. And he did pull it.
There’s plenty of referring things to complain about but this ain’t one.
It was obviously a red card and I’m not surprised they upheld it. I am surprised they stayed at a 3 game ban though, 1 game seems like a more appropriate punishment.
Now do an AI version of Grealish not mock-clapping the ref and let’s moan about that not being a second yellow.
He has been a better player lately, scored a few goals, rescued tarks a few times this season, tarks not the same player since his hamstring last season, At least with suspension o,brian will be back where he belongs,
Can AI make us a right back?
Making this AI image was such a waste of water.