๐Ÿง “Maybe in hindsight, Bruno not going in the summer and not being replaced by a Baleba or Wharton is a watershed moment that Amorim can’t come back from…”

Stephen Howson wonders if Liverpool’s success post-Steven Gerrard is an indicator of what we could’ve seen had Bruno Fernandes been sold by Manchester United in the summer ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

Become a member! – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7w8GnTF2Sp3wldDMtCCtVw/join

Stretford Paddock has content out EVERY DAY, make sure youโ€™re subscribed for your Man United fix! – https://bit.ly/DEVILSsub

๐Ÿ“ฑ Follow us over on Twitter: https://twitter.com/StretfordPaddck
๐Ÿ“ท And on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fulltimedevils/
๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Listen to Our Podcast: https://podfollow.com/stretfordpaddock/
๐Ÿ‘• Merchandise: https://stretfordpaddock.store/

Go ahead and subscribe to get all of the latest Man United news, academy updates, transfer news, Manchester United fan reactions, podcasts, top 5โ€™s on all things Man Utd, live watchalongs of Premier League, Champions League and Europa League, Highlights, Review and Analysis. Stretford Paddock began in 2019, but in July 2020 merged with Full Time Devils – the original and best Man United YouTube fan channel – which is why you may see old videos from FTD on this channel, but itโ€™s still the same place to get all the MUFC content you know and love, from Howson, McKola, Jay Motty, Joe, and the gang!

#ManUnited #ManchesterUnited #MUFC

27 Comments

  1. Please do not compare gerrard situation to Bruno. Gerrard won the CL with an average team. Bruno is nowhere near gerrards level and their situations arenโ€™t close at all

  2. The difference was Jurgen Klopp. Steven Gerrard was a major part as to why Liverpool even at their worst only finished 8th, and led them to two cl finals and won us one. We finished 2nd three times, with Steven Gerrard. We won literally every trophy bar the league with Gerrard. Gerrard has scored in every cup final. When Gerrard left and zoned out the squad we were poor. The difference was Jurgen Klopp.

  3. the fact that it took this long for these lot to realise that is crazy, even crazier that jay and joe will
    still claim we made the right choice keeping him while simultaneously saying how shit our midfield is

  4. Liverpool started to be successful when they got some compitant owners, it's got nothing to do with Gerrard. Ineos are as bad or worse as he glazers, we must be the worst run club in the league. Until united are run properly, we will be crap

  5. Such a terrible take … Gerrard was nothing like Bruno f… He could play a 8, 6 , 10 or a Rb … Gerrard left when he was past his prime…liverpool.did not become successful immediately either… Klopp joining was the turning point for us to become successful… Bruno f is a good attacking midfielder but he can't play in any other position

  6. Itโ€™s the system not Bruno. 4231 with sesko up front cuhna bruno mbuemo behind him, ugarte and mainoo/ casemiro behind them and a back four. Itโ€™s simple

  7. Im a massive Utd fan BUT Liverpool were still successful with Gerrard. Won everything bar the league! Howson talking shite again!

  8. He roams too much. The goals and assists have masked it for too long. Yes goals and assists win games, but not being disciplined allows you to be walked through. I think ยฃ100,000,000 fixes that CM. So the question is will Sesko, Cunha and Mbeumo get enough goals. Yes.

  9. For me itโ€™s more like Ruud. He was brilliant but how he played didnโ€™t suit the style we were looking to transition to in the mid 2000s