What tactics were on display for these two sides?

My Analysis software = Once Analyzer Pro : https://bit.ly/3TWXYB8
– use “FMS10” for a discount.

Support FMS on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/footballmadesimple
🔔Make sure to enable all push notifications!🔔

Football Books I recommend [Affiliate, not sponsored] :
Das Reboot:
Mensch: https://amzn.to/3wdLnNv
Football Hackers: https://amzn.to/2SseldK
Inverting the pyramid: https://amzn.to/3wi1IAU
Soccernomics: https://amzn.to/35bTxKo
Soccermatics: https://amzn.to/3xjvK7w
Watch the most recent videos:

Follow Football Made Simple:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/FootballMadeSim
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/footballmadesimple/

33 Comments

  1. I might be wrong but I feel like the high defense only worked because Argentina are lacking pace wise. If saudi continues to play like this Mexico can give them alot of trouble because they're very pacey.

  2. I actually think that only having 3 matches in the group stages is quite risky, and could end up with better teams being eliminated. 6 games (like in the CL) would be better. 9 out of 10 times Argentina probably beat Saudi Arabia. Especially after learning Saudi Arabias gimmicky tactics

  3. I did notice that argentina had no one in the midfield. It was either defense of attackers. Zero mid. I also noticed it with germany. The team with the best managed midfield is def gonna win the WC. Examples:spain 7-0, England 6-2, france 4-1. I think brazil did the the same thing. They had so many striker they put neymar in the midfield and did nothing because he doesnt know what to do in the middle

  4. when Klopp wins a final against Chelsea with high line and offside traps = he is genius
    when Renard outplay Argentina after their win streak with the same tactic = he is lucky
    dont be naive give him credit for this masterclass

  5. Also, what most pundits were saying at half time about Saudi Arabia playing a "brazen offside trap" and that conceding 3 offside goals was risky and that Argentina would get one soon that wasn't offside

    Bit ignorant. Obviously it was risky, but Renard has figured it out, VAR will catch all the marginal offsides and abused the mechanic to play the way he wants and also kill Argentina confidence and grind them down in spirits and frustrate

  6. Watch the defence line of Saudi Arabia almost playing at Half field and moving inside with the Argentinian attack wave! It was really impressive tactic of the coach

  7. Was not tactical in the second 1/2. SA coach never delivered any tactical aspect. Motivation and soul, put the technique and tactical natural. iPad coaches not have success.

  8. KSA played great in this game and they deserved the win. But as the match against Poland showed, what happened in the first game was in itself a rarity, because Saudi Arabia went on to loose without being able to score a goal out of 13 attempts. Let's see how they fare in the 3rd match against Mexico, who will have to forget about defending and will expose themselves in the back; I think if KSA play well they will come up on top.
    I really hope KSA will qualify for play offs (along with us, of course). They showed good technique and pride.

  9. I see the offside rule as something that hurts players more then help them.
    Tell me it dosen't just stop the attacking team from moveing foward by purposely not running to intercept the player… IT PUNISHES GOOD PLAYERS.
    Japan vs Germany felt like a similar comparison in terms of ranks but I'll have more respect to the Japanese in how they played (Against the team I'm rooting for) then Saudis exploiting a bs rule in football… AND I AIN'T AN ARGENTINE FAN lol
    How to win 101 don't pursue the guy faster then you as a defender and let him get called for offside…

  10. Simple: they were overconfident. Don’t get messy with strategy. This was a movie moment. Saudis made them “remember the night they played against…”

Leave A Reply