Rangers fan Craig, didn’t think Alistair Johnston’s head collision was a penalty. The panel weren’t convinced.
What do you think? Drop a comment below
Please LIKE and SUBSCRIBE to our channel, and don’t forget to click on the bell icon to get new video updates
SOCIALS:
✖ TWITTER | @ClydeSSB
📷 INSTAGRAM | instagram.com/clyde1ssb/
😀 FACEBOOK | facebook.com/clyde1
⌨ WEBSITE | clyde1.com
LISTEN LIVE
🔊Via the Clyde 1 app or desktop: https://planetradio.co.uk/clyde/player/
GET IN TOUCH WITH THE TEAM
📞 Phone in: 0141 951 1025
🖥 Tweet @ClydeSSB
28 Comments
2 penalties to beat hibs who are on a 7 game losing run says it all really
A few idiots got thru tonight talking absolute garbage. These creeps were cracking open the Buckfast on the 87th minute. Then BOOM! foul on Kyogo, Hibs player did NOT touch ball in slow-mo. King Philipe no more. King Adam Idah.
Guy is spot on, never a pen
Never seen a penalty for a clash of heads making the rules up as they go along got to wonder about these refs
Stonewall penalties
Hibs player timed his jump / challenge all wrong , accidental , but a foul none the less .
His point is if its never been given before then that sets the standard, so why diviate now? The hibs player never even stopped the celtic man from heading the ball so it didn't affect or interfere with play at that moment. It was merely a clash of heads…nothing else. If thats a foul, and because inside the box, a penalty then every team in the league should be receiving penalties for this, given that it happens in almost every game.
I actually though about this recently and asked my mate why is it if you tackle and even get a touch on the ball but your follow through boot or leg catches the opposition player then its a foul and possibly a penalty/ booking, but if you follow through on a header or worse still, miss the ball and hit the opposition mans head, it's not a foul, let alone a penalty. There seems to be a clear and unequivical distinction in the interpretation of the rules, if not the rules themselves, when it comes to a clash of heads as apposed to your legs or feet catching the opposition in a tackle.
Basically the caller is right. That first penalty was literally unprecidented and the ex celtic man failed to answer his point and question, but instead said it wasn't celtics problem because it should always be given as a foul. We definitely need clarity and consistency of application for head clashes.
Just look at who was the referee and the VAR officials?
Of course handling the ball Goldson style is never a penalty either even with 2 hands 🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪☘️☘️☘️
Always thought you were supposed to head the ball and not the opponents head after they have got to the ball first. It was late, dangerous, reckless and should have been a red card too for endangering the safety of a player. Coming from the same people who think you should still get a penalty even when offside in the build up 🤣
The guy asked for any other example of a penalty given in those circumstances and they couldn’t but claimed it’s a stonewaller. Radio Cattolica living up to its name. Gordon Dalziel loves that pay packet.
So if that was a penalty???.Was Liam Gordon's challenge on Danillo when he BROKE is Jaw bone a SENDING OFF FOR HIM!!!!
Of course it was his challenge was late same as Johnstons head challenge. But as always the SFA CORRUPT REFS CONTINUES!!!!!!!!
I wonder what team that caller supports. Dry your eyes pal.
Danilo got a smashed cheekbone but don’t seem to remember the penalty
The Agenda couldn't be any more obvious now
If you actually see it the celtic guy heads in to hibs player wtf
Agree, i said the same thing… "THAT'S A PENALTY?!?!?!?!" LOL RUBBISH. THEY ALSWAYS NEED PENALTIES TO WIN GAMES, EVEN RETAKES BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE MISSED, SO WAS THE 2ND. BS BS BS CELTIC CHEATS CLUB 😡
3 stooges😂
Never mind the head collision Kyogo was outside box when he went down and that was never a penalty .
It’s a penalty kick. Every day of the week.
Dry yer eyes 😂😂😂
A Celtic man claiming it was pen. I am shocked. Never a pen. His argument was stupid. The players jumped at the same time. Accidental collision. The fact the ref instantly pointed to the spot is concerning. I am a Jambo, but Hibs were robbed that night.
They clammed up. Couldn't give any instance that the caller was asking for. Everyone knows that when the chips are down and the heat is on them, that's when the bias towards them rears it ugly head. Been stinking now for well over a decade since a certain clubs CEO got all his placemen into the decision making positions. However all will be dismantled in the not too distant future as other clubs are now sickened of their control over everything and are pushing for total transparency in the governance of own game.
Never a penalty and you'll not find another example anywhere on the planet nevermind Scotland
Thers also a picture of the incident online and when contacts made the balls still in the picture so its not as late as this biased clowns making it out to be
Rangers fan unhappy that Celtic are getting a penalty
And these clowns think we are panicking
So if it hasn't been given as a free kick or a penalty before it must mean it's not a free kick? That's the argument?