Rory Jennings & Olivia Buzaglo discuss Conor Gallagher’s importance to Chelsea and his future at the club, with reports linking him to a January move across London to Tottenham.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Chelsearory
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chelsearory
Follow me on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@chelsearory

25 Comments

  1. I hate this new way of talking about positional play. “Oh yeah we need a false 9, with a 10 and a 6, and a false 4.” Are people so dumb that they don’t know what the positions are called???

  2. Selling him is the right decision. No positional intelligence, technical ability, passing ability, dribbling etc. Only within english football could it ever be argued that a midfielder that lacks all of those things be viewed as a mistake.

    Theres a reason no top clubs want him.

  3. The same way he said about mount guess what we never regretted rory is the epitome of clueless, Furthermore, Gallagher faces difficulties against low block teams, lacking the strategic awareness to navigate passes through a congested defense—something that Col Palmer, for example, demonstrates more effectively. This adds another layer to his challenges in certain game situations.

  4. Conor Gallagher struggles with short and side passes, and he finds it challenging to pass through a crowded field. Additionally, he lacks the ability to make over-the-top passes to locate teammates. If we assess him based on tackles and interceptions rather than his contributions to ball progression, goal involvement, and chance creation, he may not be at the level expected for Chelsea. Considering these weaknesses, selling him could be a reasonable decision.

  5. Conor at best will/should be a squad player. Not good enough technically to help us win games and no goals or assists too. He doesnt solve any problems for us playing in that advanced role.

Leave A Reply