ESPN FC’s Alexis Nunes, Janusz Michallik and James Olley disagree with each other over whether the decision to award a penalty for William Saliba’s handball against Chelsea was correct.
—-
Subscribe to ESPN UK: http://bit.ly/1oGUzVA

Follow ESPN UK across multiple platforms:
https://en-gb.facebook.com/ESPNUK

https://www.espn.co.uk/

49 Comments

  1. 100% a penalty!
    Saliba raised his arms before jumping so let's not sniff too much Assna!
    And what did Assna do at 1-0…nothing!
    What about at 2-0?
    Not one shot on goal until the Sanchez gift!
    Sit down Assna dogs!
    You got dominated!

  2. I thought Chelsea couldn’t compete & outplay Arsenal? There’s no regret as this guy is saying, this is progress & as Steve Nickol said, Chelsea can’t outplay it out score Arsenal.. remember Chelsea started rebuilding the start of this season.. Arsenal have been settled as a team for a year or so now.. let that sink in🫡 see you at emirates Arsenal

  3. Ok so you need look no further than the thumbnail image for this video for your answer to if Salibas hands/arms were in a natural position, mudryk is jumping in a similar motion to saliba and his left arm is up and out and his right arm is stretched out behind him, when you jump you use your arms for balance and leverage, watch every jump for headers throughout a game, nobody jumps like a pencil, everyone jumps with arms to the side. If the rule is that this is handball then the rule needs changing its as simple as that, I can understand giving handballs when its to gain an advantage but to jump and the ball hits you from a yard away is ridiculous, I think the pgmol needs to decide what is actually a natural and unnatural position for certain actions or if its literally just dont move your hands from your side regardless of what action you undertake.

  4. If the ball vaje off the attacker's hand and goes intontje net, does it matter whether it was a deliberate hand ball for the goal to be disallowed?
    No. It would not.
    If an arm prevents a goalward shot or causes a goal, its a hand ball call.

  5. I dont think intebt ir unnatural position has much to do with it.
    The ball clearly hits his arm after a shot tiward goal. On target or not, it interfered with the ball.

  6. Let me thank the presenter from for at least mentioning Sterling's name. She clearly knows more sense about the game than the pundits. Arsenal came with the same approach as Italy in the Euro final. They thought Raheem Sterling is the danger man they feared, so keep Raheem Sterling out of the game and Chelsea would be under control, but in the end what worked for Italy did not work for Arsenal. And to make things worse, it was Sterlings dangerous cross that threw them in a panic resulting in a hand ball and it was Sterling's sole presence in the box that through the goalie into a panic and drew him of his line. Yet not once was Sterling mentioned by the pundits in their conversation and football analysis. It's like when Sterling made the dangerous cross against Burnley that forced the player to have to either let the ball go or risk an own goal which resulted in an own goal. The player is on a different level so much that everything he does is being described as luck. You cannot be lucky so often that you are involved in so many events that end up in goals. It's about time he was given some respect and his play was properly analysed and explained. His decision making on the pitch are ruthless, direct, relentless and second to none and that is why he has been so successful and his stats so impressive. Not only is he England's highest assist provider, he's England's second highest scorer. You just wait to see his goals and assists at the end of the season which will not include all these other ways he has contributed to events that resulted in goals, including penalties, and its not luck. Peace and love

  7. As long as they call it the same then it’s good. It would be total carnage if they told referees to use common sense. I think it’s better they call of these situations handball

  8. If that's a penalty the James Ward-Prowse, Luton Town vs West Ham, at the end of the game should have been a penalty when it hit his hand while he was jumping.

  9. Mudryk fluffs the header, it's not on target and it hits Saliba's hand which is not in an "unnatural" position because Saliba is leaping for the header, same as Mudryk. "If we don't give it for that, what do we give it for" is an incredibly silly non argument.

  10. They need to simplify the rules, if it touches your hand it’s handball. Simple as. Unless hands are behind back or directly next to body. If you alow any mitigation there will always be controversy

  11. Rubbish all ridiculous views, 1, we don’t want the referee not to use his own judgment we want VAR to interview regardless of weather the referee think he’s has ruled correctly, 2, at the same time we need consistency in the same game. 3. Under half a meter with the ball travelling fast when the ball wasn’t aiming at the goal , never a penalty, 4 Jesus is clattered instant penalty, 5. No team has to play well to deserve a win they have to score more goals, when the ref deniers a clear cut penalty they determine the PL tables and probably the title

  12. The problem with Arsenal is that Gabriel Jesus and Edward Nketiah are not false 9, they are false players. Arsenal should have signed Harry Kane, they will not win anything until they sign a world class striker and sack FARTeta

  13. No it was accidental and the ball wasn’t heading towards the goal or a team mate that could’ve got to it for a finish but people are chasing the impossible perfection as we seem to like a moan 😂

  14. I always thought it was brought in for clear and obvious errors ? Not really a clear and obvious error if VAR took 5 minutes to look at it . Clear and obvious error for me is the Sanchez one where he gets nowhere near the ball and clatters Jesus . That is a clear and obvious one . Funny how VAR didn’t bother to call ref over to look at that call he missed ….

  15. why is it necessary to give penalties? What sporting sense does it make to give one team a goal because someone on the opposite team has hands.?

  16. Given the help Arsenal has gotten from VAR and referees in recent years, they should be the last team to complain. Sometimes it really feels like the federations choose a winner based on player popularity, broadcasting profits, viewership projections etc., do their best to guide the outcomes of matches based on selective VAR intervention.

  17. We should just get rid of penalties. Think about it, handballs are only an issue in the box because they lead to a penalty kick which is normally a goal.

    Why not just make it a free kick or something instead?

  18. The whole reason why penalties are given is if a player is prevented from a chance or if there is a foul… Ultimately neither is the case in the situation.

Leave A Reply