🔥 UNFAIR! Look at offside difference between Garnacho and Nathan Ake | Manchester United News

Those mother f*ckers just bias premier league to whatever result they want….. No one can imagine how frustrated and disorganized man utd players were after canceling their goal

He never like united. All his decisions are against united. Slow to blew for them when they win Free kick, but very active for arsenal and opposition of united. What a bias decision….
If they used arsenal last player head, it not off side. Whey using the legs… Is head not part of the body… Camacho is a fast player and not standing off but run inside to score that goal, ….
Its a shame…..
Double standards…..

Can I ask if the camera is in line ! No way is that offside

Nathan Ache lol. Gotta love text to speak. Goal shouldn't be given though. I'm sure the ref wasn't the recipient of any Qatari brown envelopes.

Also, let's not forget that Man U got 3 points from Wolves after the ref failed to give a pen when Onana deleted a Wolves forward late on. So cry off. United are lucky to have 6 points.

Throw var in the bin its only other people making a decision Man city have rule for them and united are robbed again

Taylor did same to Roma
Why is he still being reff
Oh I know because he is a British
Best league with poor reff
It’s shame to humanity

I'm just gonna say the referees in the league are very incompetent and VAR isn't used as efficiently. Also let some of us united fans rant on if they like I'm pretty sure Arsenal fans would have done the same wigh the Havertz penalty if the game ended in a draw.

City already champion.. reff always on zer side 4 a couple of years now..

Bit of a stupid YT video though isn't it – you can't compare the Garnacho offside with the Akanji one becuase they relate to completely different subsections of Law 11 (Offsides). Garnacho was offside because the technology showed he was. It's an unarguable fact – your (or anyone else's) opinion on the matter is irrelevant. The Akanji offside is a subjective decision by the VAR ref, who was of the opinion that the player was simply trying to get out of the way of the ball (as opposed to making a play at it, or dummying it). Law 11 states that the offside should be penalised if the player stood offside is "making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball". "Obvious action" is not defined, but because Akanji has been deemed to have been actively avoiding the ball, the VAR ref has thought that it did not constitute an obvious action, which is why the goal was given.

Well for me, before the game , I knew if this kind of situation happened for the fact s that reff it will never favor United

VAR was never meant to get involved in decisions that werent clear or obvious, so its being used incorrectly

complain when decision is against you.
when a decision is in favour of you………….

Just recive the loss

Furguson used to win such games without VAR , now man u fans are facing the reality

Stop crying, even without goals Arsenal was in training against Man united completely ou tclassed Man U. After the so called offside thing you still had a lot of time to win the the game if you claim that you were better than Arsenal

This is the same ref that was almost beaten up by Roma supporters with his family. Now again, he continued with his incompetency again, and still, he is going to be the ref until Jesus came with no consequences.

Absolutely rubbish 😑

There's no effectiveness in Var how can Garnacho be offside and Akanji onside? It was just their feelings, they didn't want United to win that game

This Var Machine is it not human beings that are also controlling it inside the room?

Human beings are prone to errors more than automatic system