➢ Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7AiAq4zB5ylQy23gg3H8hA/join

➢ My Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmpDCiPCBkXlqWnov3AI66g
➢ Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/younestalks
➢ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/youneshh92
➢ Join the Reddit HERE: https://www.reddit.com/r/younestalksfootball/

Welcome to the Younes Talks Football channel! The channel where I discuss all things football (slight bias towards Chelsea) with 100% rawness and honesty! I say it like it is so you know what you’re getting with me! This is the place to have fun, bring positive vibes and discuss football from a new perspective. Welcome on board this journey…

43 Comments

  1. UPDATE: Just to clarify, Reece James actually had his new contract settled with the new regime, although discussions for a new contract began with the old regime. 👍🏻

  2. Even though, for me, Tammy Abraham was more of a squad player than first choice striker, he's probably the closest thing we've had to a prolific striker since Costa and it does feel like selling him was a mistake. £70m does seem a lot for him but, if you look at the buy back as a net £35m spend (£70m minus the £35m we sold him for) it does seem like a bit of a no-brainer to get him. He's PL proven, offers something different, he's a proper, natural goalscorer with strikers instincts, home grown and teams definitely find him an awkward player to to defend against, which probably enhances the prospects of those playing around him since he gives them a lot to think about. What other striker with all those assets could we get for '£35m'?

    Osimhen seems like a much better prospect on paper but he'd cost about 2-3x as much as Abraham (depending on how you interpret the buy back fee) and it's debatable whether he'd even come to us if we don't have CL football. I do think that Abraham, Broja and Nkunku (plus maybe Fofana) would be good enough options for us next season and it would be nice to see us try and produce a superstar striker that is built for our system from the ground up rather than keep trying to buy one for £100m+.

    We can make all sorts of very convincing cases for Osimhen but the truth is we've no idea how he'd perform in the PL and it's easy to forget that Lukaku and Werner were both also scoring at insanely prolific levels before they joined us. People will say 'it's different this time' but I've heard that enough times to be cynical. He's not a 'one-season-wonder' but, truth be told, almost nobody was mentioning Osimhen's name before this season began. Now he's a 'generational talent' and, he might be, but he might also be flavour of the month like other 'generational talents' Luka Jovic, Andrea Belotti and Dusan Vlahovic have all been in recent years.

    In short, our problem is scoring goals and Tammy offers the highest confidence, lowest net-cost route to solving that. The way Chelsea have invested so far, it's obvious that we're not going to be a team built entirely around a striker (like City are now becoming, arguably to their detriment) but more like City last season or Arsenal where 3-4 players contribute 10+ goals a season. If we get another £100m+ striker and don't build our play around them, then we've wasted yet more money that we could spend on other important areas (i.e. a world class DM). Tammy solves our problems without us having to build the team around him.

  3. Good to be in the mix for banter, but nevertheless not a thing to care about, as to whether Paris St Germain or Tottenham, for that matter, are unlikely to win the Champions' League.

    With more Chelsea centered concerns, it becomes a lot easier to see the wood, despite the trees that abound.

    Mason Mount is just one player in the grand scheme of things, for Chelsea to consistently win football matches from henceforth.

    Along with
    Christian Pulisic;
    Ruben Loftus-Cheek;
    Hakim Ziyech;
    Mateo Kovacic;
    Conor Gallagher;
    all of whom may be very weirdly, considered to be 'surplus' to future immediate requirements, need to be sold on in the summer.

    The one perennial theme has been Chelsea's need for a skilled, net busting player to get on the end of things.

    Napoli's in-form striker could be that re-born 'Didier Drogba' that The Blues crave. Out-bid every other Club to get him. Demonstrate that Chelsea mean business. Any fears of a repeat 'Lukaku Situation' can be dispelled by unmistakably referencing a potential career arresting outcome, should failure to deliver is even dreamed about.

  4. James deserves the money because hes the best rb in the world, is Mount even one of the best cms in the league? Certainly hasnt been since 2021. Not worth extending his contract when he hasnt shown to be turning things around

  5. Younuz, point of correction. Remember so of players we intended to buy from Barcelona fc? It's only in Barcelona fc that players pledge loyalty to the club

  6. Mason was never proper chels, he's always been proper Portsmouth😆 couldn't give a 💩 if he leaves tbh cya later pal close the door on your way out👋🏿

  7. Youness, I dont think the French league is the main problem for PSG, although I'm not completely ruling it out. But I think, the way PSG is running itself is the main reason. It seem that they have no no clear strategy apart of buying a star player. Look at Ajax in the 90's, they are from the Dutch league, which is similar or even lower than the French league, and definitely lower than Italian, Spanish and English league. But they managed to win a couple of European trophy because they used have a very good strategy on running the club.

  8. we play better without Mount. You can see what we are like without James. you wold think that if Mason wanted to impress for a new contract he would try harder…he just has not performed

  9. I know its trendy to hate Mount and love Reece but i do think it is a bit unfair they give him a longer contract for less money than Reece, based on what both have accomplished to date. If we're objective, maybe Mase edges it just by availability reasons. Then you can talk about potential and everything you want, but an 8 year at 180k, its not premium. We have actual bums for a lot more.

  10. How much are they paying Enzo that just came, how much are they paying sterling it a stupid contract even I won't take it, he deserves 300 a week.

  11. Please Chelsea management should allow Mason Mount to go for his performance is something else this season and we don't need that. For me, Victor Osimhen is far better than Abraham, he is more clinical in the goal area, and his shots are more direct than that of Abraham. Though Abraham is premiership proven my fear for Osimhen is whether he can deliver in the Premiership. Notwithstanding, I prefer Victor to Abraham.

Leave A Reply