Girona is that youπ’π’π’you never still move on ,mugu Abeg make una tell me the difference between arsenal and una this season?fool na hazard na him you decide to post
Why not use goals to put Filippo Nzaghi in the list, he scored bunches of goals for Milan during his playing career, but does that made him a great player, no, he is one of the worst player i have ever seen, technically Nzaghi is too poor to be compared with players like Seedorf, Kaka, and others
Goals should NEVER be a yardstick! So with his 10 goals, how successful is he? Show me his cabinet…The difference between the 2 is like comparing bread & tea with Akpu & Egusi soup..
Hazard is better player but football is all about goals which should b a yardstick.. without goals U can't win games, if Gordon goes ahead to score X3 then his better UCL player than hazard as simple as ABC Frget dribbling is just entertainment… Dribbling without end product is Rubbish
On a more serious note, once they have all retired, the only means of comparison between the two players will be their statistical records. Despite Hazard being an exceptionally talented player with remarkable technical skills, when considering performance in the UEFA Champions League, Gordon's statistics are quite revealing. As previously mentioned, history tends to remember not just flair and technical skill, but primarily statistics. Messi's greatness is attributed not only to his exceptional playing abilities but also to his impressive statistics, including goals, assists, individual awards, and records broken. Similarly, Ronaldo's achievements in terms of goals and awards are self-evident. Therefore, it is likely that, ultimately, Gordon will be regarded as a superior player in the Champions League compared to Hazard, as his statistical achievements will stand as testament to his performance.
39 Comments
He wasnβt finished before going to Real Madrid, he flopped upon arriving there
I don't like the way you painted this issue, small time, you go say make we nor gorge Messi and Ronaldo base on goals, I love Hazard anyways
Girona is that youπ’π’π’you never still move on ,mugu
Abeg make una tell me the difference between arsenal and una this season?fool na hazard na him you decide to post
In terms of finishing, Hazard is not there and that is why his goals are few. Hazard nor sabi score.
Gordon cannot play what retired Hazard is playing in exhibition games. We canβt compare prime Hazard to Gordon. E no reach
Oga leave statistics Hazard na God, Godons they never born am ooooo
Why not use goals to put Filippo Nzaghi in the list, he scored bunches of goals for Milan during his playing career, but does that made him a great player, no, he is one of the worst player i have ever seen, technically Nzaghi is too poor to be compared with players like Seedorf, Kaka, and others
Gordon doesn't come near Eden in terms of balling!
Oga talk about Barcelona not willing to pay Rashford fee that was agreed on
Hazard quick finish
KOMBO!!!
Barca pay rashy
Eden is always a master can't compare bro
Those who compare Gordon with hazard don't watch football,in EPL 4 yrs back to back hazard destroy EPL
Gordon is a baby to compare to Hazard.
It's a disrespect to Hazard
Look for something else to talk about Not hazard
Anybody who even have this thought should be arrested and sent to prison for life ππ
No be penalty full him goal
Eden Hazard? Obu ngwongwo. Forget, Hazard is harzardous
Goals should NEVER be a yardstick!
So with his 10 goals, how successful is he? Show me his cabinet…The difference between the 2 is like comparing bread & tea with Akpu & Egusi soup..
Flop π at Madrid π
Oga. Na ur opinion be that. Dorden is a far better player
He dribbles as well .
He is more a creative dribbler than hazard .
And a better finisher.
If the two are on ground for me to pick him over hazard who is injury headmaster
Lampard had more goals than Zidane but you cant compare Lamps to Zizu.
Aje
Hazard is better player but football is all about goals which should b a yardstick.. without goals U can't win games, if Gordon goes ahead to score X3 then his better UCL player than hazard as simple as ABC Frget dribbling is just entertainment… Dribbling without end product is Rubbish
Gordon as how i be Man U fan oo but bro Harzard na player only Chelsea can relate
Itβs like if the situation is not about Real Madrid kombo head day always work well π
Nobody will ever do this comparison. Anthony saf wont agree so stop pls
Yes na what is the hardest thing to do in football
I know where you are heading to with this your analysis
Lol π
I know where you are heading to with this your analysis
Lol π
Gordon has nothing to offer when it comes to hazard.
The same way one fool was discrediting Wayne Rooney because he never won the EPL Golden Boot
On a more serious note, once they have all retired, the only means of comparison between the two players will be their statistical records. Despite Hazard being an exceptionally talented player with remarkable technical skills, when considering performance in the UEFA Champions League, Gordon's statistics are quite revealing. As previously mentioned, history tends to remember not just flair and technical skill, but primarily statistics. Messi's greatness is attributed not only to his exceptional playing abilities but also to his impressive statistics, including goals, assists, individual awards, and records broken. Similarly, Ronaldo's achievements in terms of goals and awards are self-evident. Therefore, it is likely that, ultimately, Gordon will be regarded as a superior player in the Champions League compared to Hazard, as his statistical achievements will stand as testament to his performance.
Gordon he done win ucl
Yes goals should be the important
Hazard is the best he is a legend
Even the entire Newcastle knows, Eden hazard very well
After Messi and Ronaldo of this generation Hazard is next
Gordon Na pikin for Hazard ohh .. who draw this stat abeg No be goals matter chances created by Hazard way high ohh