SUBSCRIBE ► https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsPL
PREMIER LEAGUE HIGHLIGHTS ► http://bit.ly/SkySportsPLHighlights2223
Jamie Redknapp and Glenn Murray agreed that Manchester Utd should have been awarded a penalty for this challenge on Scott McTominay.

Watch Premier League LIVE on Sky Sports here ► http://bit.ly/WatchSkyPL
►TWITTER: https://twitter.com/skysportsPL
►FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/skysportsfootball
►WEBSITE: http://www.skysports.com/football

MORE FROM SKY SPORTS ON YOUTUBE:
►SKY SPORTS PREMIER LEAGUE: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsPL
►SKY SPORTS FOOTBALL: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyFootball
►SKY SPORTS BOXING: http://bit.ly/SSBoxingSub
►SKY SPORTS CRICKET: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyCricket
►SOCCER AM: http://bit.ly/SoccerAMSub
►SKY SPORTS F1: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyF1
►SKY SPORTS: http://bit.ly/SkySportsSub
►SKY SPORTS GOLF: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsGolf

40 Comments

  1. Clear pen, we’ve seen this kinda foul being made nearly everyday but after what happened at city they not going to be more harsh on United now.

  2. As a united fan we cant complain after the city var decision. What we can complain about is the scheduling of this season is ridiculous, we were dead on our feet second half.

  3. Absolutely despise United but that is a clear Penalty. Further shows the inconsistencies with VAR and how clueless the officials in this country are. Officials are literally deciding the outcomes of games.

  4. Says it all when an ex Palace player Glenn Murray says it’s a clear Penalty. Officials in the Premier League are an absolute joke, and the clowns on VAR.. well, how they get paid week in week out is ridiculous.

  5. Probably, but swings and roundabouts. Look at the last United game… Can hardly complain, should've killed the game beforehand

  6. The problem with VAR is with this now recent swing of too far the other way, before they spent too long looking at things only for us to disagree with the decision at the end and have no explanation, now they seemingly rush the decisions only for us to disagree and have no explanation. They seem to be spending too much time for little decisions which are not clearly and obviously wrong but too little time on important decisions which are very blatantly controversial and so need more care and time.

  7. We won’t make a PowerPoint presentation and not shut up about it for weeks like a certain set of fans. It’s a clear pen but it’s football get on with it

  8. Look at the way the media are making out united were hard done by just because they got a awful corrupt decision last week. So they are trying to play the pity trick for their beloved club. Get to F sky an the officials. That decision last week was absolutely disgusting dont try an brush it under the carpet with this BS

  9. Richards does touch the ball because after Scott mctominay touches the ball so does Richard if Richard touch the ball the ball would have bounced which did but if he didn't then the ball wouldn't bounce

  10. VAR giveth and VAR taketh away. Lucky call against city, unlucky call tonight.

    I'll never undestand why refs dont go to the monitors more often. Let the actual ref referee the game not VAR.

  11. I'm not sure why the pundits are saying he "definitely didn't" touch the ball because you can see the ball divert slightly even on what they deem is "the best angle"(hmmm). It's more obvious on some of the other angles. I think there is a slight touch on the ball from the Murray after McTominay shifted the ball with his foot and I can see from these comments I'm not the only one who sees it. That said, I've often complained about this bar set that it's not a foul if they get the slightest of touches on the ball. I've seen City on the end of those, the player takes out the attacker without actually "winning the ball" just get a touch which changed nothing. The biggest impact was bringing the player down and halting the attack. You just know the pundits would be defending the decision on the basis of a glance on the ball if it were Palace on the receiving end of that call. That's what I don't like about their coverage, if there's even the slightest claim to defend their media darlings they'll take it. Just some examples of them defending the indefensible in City games: United "He didn't touch the ball" Liverpool "Mane went for the ball, not his fault he missed and gave Ederson a flying kick to the face… The refs had a nightmare". I suppose they don't call them, the Big Sly 3 for nothing, the bias is still there after all this time.

  12. It should be penalty but but its English refs’ standard and to respect of the game speed var mostly doesnt involved. Thats why I love Premier League ❤

Leave A Reply