SUBSCRIBE ► https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsPL
PREMIER LEAGUE HIGHLIGHTS ► http://bit.ly/SkySportsPLHighlights2223
The Ref Watch panel debate whether Marcus Rashford did interfere with play from an offside position that saw Bruno Fernandes equalise against Manchester City.
Watch Premier League LIVE on Sky Sports here ► http://bit.ly/WatchSkyPL
►TWITTER: https://twitter.com/skysportsPL
►FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/skysportsfootball
►WEBSITE: http://www.skysports.com/football
MORE FROM SKY SPORTS ON YOUTUBE:
►SKY SPORTS PREMIER LEAGUE: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsPL
►SKY SPORTS FOOTBALL: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyFootball
►SKY SPORTS BOXING: http://bit.ly/SSBoxingSub
►SKY SPORTS CRICKET: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyCricket
►SOCCER AM: http://bit.ly/SoccerAMSub
►SKY SPORTS F1: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyF1
►SKY SPORTS: http://bit.ly/SkySportsSub
►SKY SPORTS GOLF: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsGolf
23 Comments
Dry your eyes Rob. Dermott has explained it to you. On another point how the hell did Dier stay on the field on Sunday. Surely 2 yellow cards for gobbing back to the ref
We won it nothing to talk too much ☺️
Gone another manchester derby
Obviously interfering with play. Which Man U attacking player should the defender go to to make the tackle to win the ball?
Using bloody screenshots 😂
Odd how there wasn’t this level of scrutiny and obsession with the Salah offside v Wolves.
It was a clear offside 💙.
So today he’s saying it’s offside but when he was getting paid for whatever channel he was being a ref pundit on Saturday, then he’s saying it should have stood. Need to make up his mind
How many words this guy is using to describe such a simple decision pretty much sums up why they keep on getting these calls wrong. Is Rashford interfering with play? YES > Offside. Simple.
It’s a rule not a law, stop making ball on grade sound more intelligent. Should never have stood, complete corruption.
Neither Akanji or Walker tried to slide in and block the shot, and if Rashford was in front of Walker instead of Akanji people would be saying "Walker would've slid in and stopped that shot if it wasn't for Rashford being in front of him", but he didn't. All these 'what if' scenarios has to go, because there's nothing proving any of them would've happened.
I think it was offside, not because the defender would have gotten the ball but because Rashford sufficiently distracted the keeper. As a UTD fan I'm delighted with the win, but we did get a bit lucky with the first goal. Having said that I'm not sure City did enough to deserve the win, a draw would have been a fair result I think.
This ref also explained that pulling shirts in the box is also subjective. He did it when gabriel's shirt was pulled in the new castle game. Atwell should have stuck with the linesman.
Rushford wasn't interfering with play.
There's a video on YouTube without Rushford in it, and it's the same result.
You people give your own opinions. Please stick with the offside law, NOT your own opinions.
Did Rashford touch the ball?
as a neutral i totally agree that this should have been called offside
The screenshot is unfair because the ball travels way faster than what is appearing on the screenshot. Come on sky sports you can't just remove Rashford and concluded that Akanji is getting the ball.
This could've been a 3 second video of him saying yes.
GET OVER IT !!!
People are really scared of United getting back into the old days of causing trauma to rivals,liverpool litterally in the same week had a controversial decision but sure United Agenda when they can got us for loosing
The united fans in this comment section are hilarious, if that was given against them they'd be crying but because its for them its a perfectly valid goal and the city fans are crying just LOL. I dislike both teams but never in a million years should that have stood
Bitter blue moon s on here
The decision is correct, it’s the laws which are wrong, same as Salahs goal v Wolves