Havertz was better at CHELSEA?! 😳 #shorts

Join now to become a member to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZDi95PJ6VmWtQAScA9Rh-w/join

🎙 Talking Football on Spotify ➡️ https://globalfan.link/talking-football
🎧 FCM Podcast on Spotify ➡️ https://globalfan.link/fcm-podcast

▶️ Subscribe to DR Sports: https://globalfan.link/dr-youtube
📲 Follow us on Instagram: https://globalfan.link/dr-instagram
💬 Follow us on X: https://globalfan.link/dr-x
🎥 Follow us on TikTok: https://globalfan.link/dr-tiktok
👍 Follow us on Facebook: https://globalfan.link/dr-facebook
🧵 Follow us on Threads: https://globalfan.link/dr-threads

#DRTrends #Football #DRSports

46 Comments

  1. Giroud and Ashley Cole were better at Arsenal, hence Chelsea bought them. Its just that they went on to do great things at Chelsea as well. Fabregas got his training wheels in Arsenal, when Chelsea got him he was a complete player.

  2. Trophies aside, I think there’s no right answer to where were Giroud and Fabregas better at Chelsea or at Arsenal. Agree with the rest though💙. And I’d like to thank Arsenal for taking our dump over the years

  3. What Havertz did in Arsenal? I don't know, maybe score more goals in two seasons than in three seasons for Chelsea? Fabregas at Chelsea? 50 % what he was at Arsenal. Same with Olivier Giroud. Willian, Jorginho and Sterling were flops tho. I agree with the rest.

  4. I have never seen clubs that are supposed to be each others biggest competitors as London’s top clubs trade so much between each other it’s insane the amount of deals they do with each other in the premier league era is nuts.
    Liverpool and Man Utd never ever do a deal direct with each other never happens even Liverpool with Man City it’s like once in a decade if that while Arsenal and Chelsea is near enough one every other transfer window which is just really weird how they so comfortable to trade with each other as if it’s cool and the fans won’t mind as the rivalry is probably the most friendly rivalry in premier league now.
    “Hey Arsenal you need a winger yeah come take him oh it’s cool take him on loan for year oh Chelsea what your low on money and need to get your financial books up its cool we will pay you £50m.” WTF is this stuff it’s like they brothers sharing each other cloths every now and then. I can’t see them as rivals to each other at all it’s just was too smooth how they trade so easily with each other without any backlash. Look how nuts people went when they said Alex Ferguson was trying to buy Fernando Torres and Steven Gerrard when Man Utd were the most dominate club by a mile in premier league at that time and everyone was like that ain’t going to happen and it didn’t. Yet Ashley Cole was equivalent standard of Steven Gerrard at the time for a left back in terms of quality and that deal went through. WTF

  5. I think individually Havertz performs better for Arteta than he did at Chelsea. The CL goal is the biggest thing he's done for us really. I'd argue Cesc did more of a job for Arsenal overall despite the two titles for Chelsea. The rest are fair.

  6. omg, 70% reason was "UCL winner", cmon. Giroud was awesome in Arsenal, one of the best strikers in the world. Gallas was incredible at Arsenal. Havertz is way better now in Arsenal than he was in Chelsea

  7. I agree with about 90-95% here. Thing to note is transfer fees and the reason they were bought for each club. A lot of ex-Chelsea players were only brought to Arsenal as rotation players for much smaller fees than Chelsea paid for them. It's not as binary as where they played better – you need to factor in at what stage of their career they were brought in and for what reason. For example, 1st team Jorginho at Chelsea vs sub at Arsenal Jorginho are two very different players for obvious reasons.