Man City Want To Go In For Diogo Costa? | Man City Daily Transfer Update

then what about our james trafford?

Well Ortega might leave us along with Ederson this summer so why not bring them both
Edit: Both players contracts are set to expire next summer

All 3 City keepers have contracts that expire in 11 months’ time. Not ideal. If Ederson leaves we need to keep Ortega and make Trafford No.1.

I think what's going on with the goalkeeping situation is:
-If Ederson leaves its Diogo Costa as a number one
-If Ortega leaves its Trafford as a number two(i think they feel he will need time to integrate)

If guardiola and his management are tired of that team let me come and take over as a manager this is what they did on Palmer by allowing him to leave today we are crying please don't let Trafford to sign to another club him and Costa are perfect for us allow Ederson and Ortega to leave they have tried for us and again I beg you Guardiola in the name of GOD please allow Akanji to leave and replace him with Diamonde of sporting Lisbon and not every match will your beloved son will play I mean bernaldo Silva favouritism caused us many marches last season I beg stop causing us high blood pressure with your selection and it remains one if you include Eze eberechi of crystal palace in our team for that no 10 position against all these low block teams we play against we're GOOD to GO l beg reason these things and do them I love mancity .🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

09:33 I thought selling Johnny would have been what kills 2 birds with 1 Stone. No?

Sign both and sell ortega and ederson

Me my favorite man city move to Diego Costa is good please

if Ortega leave it Trafford as number two

I want Costa over Trafford

Selling ortega, letting ederson run down his contract and bringing in trafford to bed in over one year period. That could be an option.

If he doesnt cut it, then next year search for a new keeper

Sell-on clause:
This clause is activated when the buying club sells the player to a different club. The selling club receives a percentage of the profit from that subsequent transfer.
Buy-back clause:
This clause is activated when the original selling club wants to buy the player back from the current club. It's a way for the original club to potentially reacquire the player under specific terms.
If a club includes both clauses in a deal with the same club, it creates a conflict. If the buying club sells the player back to the original club (activating the buy-back clause), there's no subsequent sale to a third club, thus negating the sell-on clause. Conversely, if the buying club sells to a third club, the buy-back clause becomes irrelevant.
Therefore, in a standard transfer between two clubs, you'd typically see one or the other, but not both. Clubs might use a sell-on clause when selling to a club that is expected to develop the player and potentially sell them on for a profit, while a buy-back clause is used when a club wants to retain the option to re-sign a player they are currently selling.

What about Rodrygo, and the right back position