Jim White & Simon Jordan discuss Lucas Paqueta’s betting case!

Subscribe: https://youtube.com/c/talkSPORT

Enjoyed this YouTube video? 😍

🖥️ talkSPORT’s Website: https://talksport.com/
📲 talkSPORT’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/talkSPORT
📷 talkSPORT’s Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talksport/?hl=en
👤 talkSPORT’s Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/talkSPORT/
📱 talkSPORT’s Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talksport?

🔴 Download the talkSPORT app HERE! – https://talksport.com/apps/

🔎 Want to see if you feature on our YouTube channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFVMnSsi_04LGLa9pS9xDv__me-Gjmlu2

#WHUFC
#westham
#talkSPORT
#PremierLeague

25 Comments

  1. My attempt at a sensual massage ended with me realizing my hands are better suited for typing than kneading. Note to self: Leave the professional massages to the experts🍭

  2. Must be hard earning 150k a week for 5 years 😢 he could get banned tomorrow and retire and his set for life.

  3. Why on earth has the FA let this drag on so long? All the bets were low value and he didn’t bet himself. The actual bookings are inconclusive so you wonder what evidence the FA has got

  4. Well the problem is that now it looks like the FA are floundering with the conviction but if he is proven innocent they will be liable to be sued by Paqueta for the way he has been treated and the lost £85m transfer to Man City that was agreed up until the charges.

  5. It must be very difficult to prove he's guilty unless there have been payments to him or there is some kind of message trail showing he's agreed to get booked or discussed specific games in some way in advance

    Without that kind of information, they could just ask if there are any matches where people have bet on him being booked and lost the bets

    Also TalkSport have a role to play in things like this too, by having betting companies as sponsors, who give tips on betting which sometimes are about who will be booked in a game.
    If they say have a bet on person X getting booked, which they have in the past, then a flood of people make that bet, if the player then gets booked it looks suspicious, when really it's just coincidence

  6. when simon jordan talks about his experiences it's about English law
    in England law the basis of what UAFA and now the Premier League have took Manchester City to task the hacked emails would be thrown out so maybe he shouldn't mixed the two up or is he Arthur and Martha

  7. Simon Jordan knows sweet FA about this case or Paqueta's circumstances.
    If you want to know what evidence they have and what the defence is, just check out the West Ham fan channels.

  8. Simon's understanding of litigation is all over the place. It isn't the obligation of the accused to bring the action to disposal. The same with the City accusations. It's up the claimant to initiate proceedings.

    Simon doesn't shut up about how City or Paqueta should bring the proceedings to be issued against themselves. It's not possible. It simply isn't how our legal system works. The claimant's job is to put up or shut up. The Defendant can sit back and tell them to go fish until such time.

  9. I have no sympathy, for a guy who by deciding when he gets booked. Has basically cost lots of people money on their bets. What a country we live in. Let's all feel bad for the criminal. Probably have a statue up soon

  10. David Moyes testified on Paquettas behalf saying that he asked to be taken off against Bournemouth before he got booked on the 90 th minute ….Moyes statement was very convincing in his defence

  11. i checked out after Jordan admitted that he knows sweet FA about the FA's procedures 'not sure' at 3:04 and then 'i am wondering if..' at 3:51, before then going on to extrapolate about it anyway ..

  12. Why do we allow, or why do betting companies allow bets on things like players getting yellow cards.
    It is ridiculous that bets are allowed for outcomes where players can quite easily affect those things.